Volume 18, Issue 1 (2025)                   JMED 2025, 18(1): 106-114 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.ZAUMS.REC.1401.184


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nosratzehi M, Arbabisarjou A, Nosratzehi S, Nosratzehi M. The relationship between concentration factors in the classroom and academic achievement motivation in medical students. JMED 2025; 18 (1) :106-114
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2188-en.html
1- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ali IbneAbitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan, Iran
2- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Genetics of Non-communicable Disease Research Center, Ali lbne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. , shnosratzehi123@gmail.com
4- School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Abstract:   (293 Views)
Background & Objective: One of the key factors influencing the quality of education is the effective teaching practices of professors, which are closely linked to the concentration levels of students in the classroom. Additionally, academic motivation plays a crucial role in enhancing the learning experience. This study aims to investigate the relationship between classroom concentration factors and academic achievement motivation among medical students at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences.
Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 273 students from basic science and preparatory clinical courses completed questionnaires from 22 OCT to November 20, 2023. The data collection tools included two questionnaires: one focused on classroom concentration and the other on academic motivation. The data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results: The study found that the total mean concentration score in the classroom was 61.5 ± 7.9. The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis revealed a direct and significant relationship between mean concentration scores related to environmental factors and professor characteristics and the academic motivation of students. Additionally, there was a direct and significant correlation between the overall concentration score in class and academic motivation (r = 0.174, p = 0.004).
Conclusion: It appears that as academic achievement motivation in students increases, their concentration in class also improves. Therefore, to enhance the quality of teaching and learning through various methods, efforts should be made to boost academic achievement motivation.

 
Full-Text [PDF 796 kb]   (40 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (35 Views)  
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2024/06/2 | Accepted: 2024/10/19 | Published: 2025/04/14

References
1. Salvioni DM, Franzoni S, Cassano R. Sustainability in the higher education system: An opportunity to improve quality and image. Sustainability. 2017;9(6):914. [DOI]
2. Griban GP, Tymoshenko O, Arefiev V, et al. The role of physical education in improving the health status of students of special medical groups. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2020;73(6):534-40. [DOI]
3. Valenciano-Mendoza E, Fernández-Aranda F, Granero R, et al. Prevalence of suicidal behavior and associated clinical correlates in patients with behavioral addictions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(21). [DOI]
4. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2016;23:1382-414. [DOI]
5. Cicekci MA, Sadik F. Teachers' and students' opinions about students' attention problems during the lesson. Journal of Education and Learning. 2019;8(6):15-30 [DOI]
6. Mahvar T, Farahani MA, Aryankhesal A. Conflict management strategies in coping with students’ disruptive behaviors in the classroom: systematized review. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2018;6(3):102. [DOI]
7. Perkins K, Wieman C. The surprising impact of seat location on student performance. The Physics Teacher. 2005;43(1): 30-33 [DOI]
8. Servatyari K, Mardani N, Servatyari B, Yazdanpanah H. The study of factors affecting concentration in classroom among high school students in Divandarreh city, Iran, in 2018. Chronic Disease Journal. 2019;7(3):153-9. [DOI]
9. Clark M, Middleton SC, Nguyen D, Zwick LK. Mediating relationships between academic motivation, academic integration and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences. 2014;33:30-8. [DOI]
10. Wigfield A, Cambria J. Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review. 2010;30(1):1-35. [DOI]
11. Mahdavi P, Valibeygi A, Moradi M, Sadeghi S. Relationship between achievement motivation, mental health and academic success in university students. Community Health Equity Research & Policy. 2023;43(3):311-7. [DOI]
12. Filgona J, Sakiyo J, Gwany D, Okoronka A. Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 2020;10(4):16-37. [DOI]
13. Henning MA, Krägeloh CU, Hawken SJ, Doherty I, Zhao Y, Shulruf BJMSE. Motivation to learn, quality of life and estimated academic achievement: medical students studying in New Zealand. Medical Science Educator. 2011;21:142-50. [DOI]
14. Ahn D, Park G, Baek KJ, Chung SI. Academic motivation, academic stress, and perceptions of academic performance in medical students. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 2007;19(1):59-71. [DOI]
15. Komarraju M, Karau SJ, Ramayah T. Cross-cultural differences in the academic motivation of university students in Malaysia and the United States. North American Journal of Psychology. 2007;9(2):275–292. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jun 2007] [DOI]
16. Haresabadi M, Raofian H, Akhlaghi D, Jamchi H, Salehi M. Factors affecting student concentration in classroom: Students’ viewpoints in North Khorasan university of medical sciences. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2016;8(2):237-44 [DOI]
17. McInerney DM, Sinclair KE. Cross cultural model testing: inventory of school motivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1991;51(1):123-33. [DOI]
18. McInerney DM, Sinclair KE. Dimensions of school motivation: a cross-cultural validation study. Journal of cross-cultural psychology. 1992;23(3):389-406 [DOI]
19. McInerney DM, Roche LA, McInerney V, Marsh HW. Cultural perspectives on school motivation: the relevance and application of goal theory. American Educational Research Journal. 1997;34(1):207-36. [DOI]
20. McInerney DM, Yeung AS, McInerney V. Cross-cultural validation of the inventory of school motivation (ISM): motivation orientations of Navajo and Anglo students. Journal of Applied Measurement. 2001;2(2):135-53. [DOI]
21. Barzgar R, Aliabadi K, Nili M. Comparing the effectiveness of instructional designs based on Gagne model of learning and Dick & Carey instructional design model on learning, retention and achievement motivation of students. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education. 2014;10(1):98-120. [DOI]
22. Marzban A, Rahmanian V, Seifi M, et al. Investigating the effective ecological factors on concentration in the classroom from the viewpoints of students of Shahid Sadoughi university of medical sciences, Yazd. Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development. 2019;4(2):753-62. [DOI]
23. Abdulrahman M, Makki M, Shaaban S, et al. Specialty preferences and motivating factors: a national survey on medical students from five UAE medical schools. Education for Health. 2016;29(3):231-43. [DOI]
24. Ballard K, Bates A. Making a connection between student achievement, teacher accountability, and quality classroom instruction. The Qualitative Report. 2008;13(4):560-80. [DOI]
25. Mellard DF, Krieshok T, Fall E, Woods K. Dispositional factors affecting motivation during learning in adult basic and secondary education programs. Reading and Writing. 2013;26:515-38 [DOI]
26. Aliabadi M, Mahdavi N, Farhadian M, Shafie Motlagh M. Evaluation of noise pollution and acoustic comfort in the classrooms of Hamadan university of medical sciences in 2012. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics. 2013;1(2):19-27. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 5, 2014] [DOI]
27. Silva L, Santos R. Acoustical comfort in primary school classrooms in the city of João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil. Journal of Ergonomics. 2013;S1(001):1-6 [DOI]
28. Ghorbani R, Haji-Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F, Shams-Abadi M. Viewpoints of nursing and para-medical students about the features of a good university lecturer. Koomesh Journal. 2009;10(2):e152223. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Mar. 23, 2009] [DOI]
29. Mehralizadeh S, Ghorbani R, Zolfaghari S, Shahinfar H, Nikkhah R, Pourazizi M. Factors affecting student concentration in classroom: medical students’ viewpoints in Semnan university of medical sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2013;13(8):663-71. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Nov. 3, 2013] [DOI]
30. Wu H, Li S, Zheng J, Guo J. Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical Education. 2020;25(1):1742964. [DOI]
31. Maiztegi-Kortabarria J, Arribas-Galarraga S, Luis-de Cos I, Espoz-Lazo S, Valdivia-Moral P. Effect of an active break intervention on attention, concentration, academic performance, and self-concept in compulsory secondary education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2024;14(3):447-62. [DOI]
32. Wilson VE, Peper E, Schmid A. Training strategies for concentration. In: Williams JN, editor. Applied sport psychology: personal growth to peak performance. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2006. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 2011] [DOI]
33. . Le HV. An investigation into factors affecting concentration of university students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 2021 Jun 8;3(6):07-12 [DOI]
34. Mahmoudi A, Mahmoudi F, Mahmoudi MS, Shamsai M. Comparison of academic achievement of Shiraz medical students. Teb & Tazkieh. 2020;29(4):45-9. [DOI]
35. Seli H. Motivation and learning strategies for college success: a focus on self-regulated learning. Routledge; 2019 Aug 30. 135-137. [DOI]
36. Majidianfard MB, Sadri Nasab Babakan M. The relationships among social skills, anxiety and academic performance of nursing students of Yasuj university of medical sciences in 2018. Journal of Educational Studies. 2020;8(1):19-28. [DOI]
37. Sun JC, Chen AY, Yeh KP, Cheng YT, Lin YY. Is group polling better? An investigation of the effect of individual and group polling strategies on students’ academic performance, anxiety, and attention. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2018;21(1):12-24. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan 1, 2018] [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.