Fri, Nov 22, 2024
[Archive]
Mohsen Masoumian Hosseni 
, Somayeh Rajabzadeh * , Babak Sabet , Roya Vatankhah , Seyed Mohammad Ebadirad
, Somayeh Rajabzadeh * , Babak Sabet , Roya Vatankhah , Seyed Mohammad Ebadirad
Department of E-learning in Medical Sciences, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (166 Views)
Background & Objective: Aligning faculty members' learning styles with their teaching approaches is a complicated topic in education. Understanding these inclinations can help enhance pedagogical practices and build a more inclusive learning environment. Thus, this study examined the relationship between learning style preferences and teaching technique choices among Iranian faculty members.
Material & Methods: From May to July 2022, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among faculty members at Iranian medical universities via the Porsline website. Virtual snowball sampling was used to recruit 526 individuals. The VARK questionnaire was translated into Persian and showed excellent reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. The final data collection tools included the translated VARK questionnaire, self-assessment questions about teaching methods, university resources, and digital media center equipment. Analytical methods included descriptive statistics, logistic regression analysis, and chi-square testing for data evaluation.
Results: The survey found that clinical teachers preferred reading and writing (54%), whereas fundamental science educators preferred visual-auditory and reading-writing. The effect of gender, field of study, learning style, age, and professional academic factors on the dependent variable, teaching method, was investigated using chi-square tests and logistic regression. The findings revealed that while there was no significant relationship between the variable gender and teaching method, significant associations were found with the variables field of study, learning style, age, and professional academic. Notably, it was observed that the effect size of field of study, age, and professional academic on teaching method is small, while for learning style, it is medium in magnitude.
Conclusion: The study uncovers a significant correlation between learning styles and teaching methods, suggesting that their learning backgrounds may shape teachers' teaching methods.
Material & Methods: From May to July 2022, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among faculty members at Iranian medical universities via the Porsline website. Virtual snowball sampling was used to recruit 526 individuals. The VARK questionnaire was translated into Persian and showed excellent reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. The final data collection tools included the translated VARK questionnaire, self-assessment questions about teaching methods, university resources, and digital media center equipment. Analytical methods included descriptive statistics, logistic regression analysis, and chi-square testing for data evaluation.
Results: The survey found that clinical teachers preferred reading and writing (54%), whereas fundamental science educators preferred visual-auditory and reading-writing. The effect of gender, field of study, learning style, age, and professional academic factors on the dependent variable, teaching method, was investigated using chi-square tests and logistic regression. The findings revealed that while there was no significant relationship between the variable gender and teaching method, significant associations were found with the variables field of study, learning style, age, and professional academic. Notably, it was observed that the effect size of field of study, age, and professional academic on teaching method is small, while for learning style, it is medium in magnitude.
Conclusion: The study uncovers a significant correlation between learning styles and teaching methods, suggesting that their learning backgrounds may shape teachers' teaching methods.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2023/06/5 | Accepted: 2024/05/7
Received: 2023/06/5 | Accepted: 2024/05/7
References
1. Baguley M, Danaher P, Davies A, et al. Learning and teaching styles. Educational Learning and Development: Building and Enhancing Capacity. 2014:98-110. [DOI]
2. Drago WA, Wagner RJ. Vark preferred learning styles and online education. Management Research News. 2004;27(7):1-13. [DOI]
3. Soureshjani KH, Naseri N. Perceptual learning-style preferences of Iranian EFL learners in relation to their proficiency level. American Journal of Linguistics. 2012;1(4):70-4. [DOI]
4. Khademi M, Motallebzadeh K, Ashraf H. The relationship between Iranian EFL instructors' understanding of learning styles and their students' success in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching. 2013;6(4):134-42. [DOI]
5. Atlasi MA, Moravveji A, Nikzad H, Mehrabadi V, Naderian H. Learning styles and strategies preferences of Iranian medical students in gross anatomy courses and their correlations with gender. Anatomy & cell biology. 2017;50(4):255. [DOI]
6. Kharb P, Samanta PP, Jindal M, Singh V. The learning styles and the preferred teaching—learning strategies of first year medical students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2013;7(6):1089. [DOI]
7. Quan-Baffour KP. Exploring teaching approaches responsive to adult learning styles in community college classrooms in Limpopo, South Africa. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 2023;47(3):183-96. [DOI]
8. Rawat S, Makwana KK, Pathak RR, Rathod NM. Identification of preferred learning styles as per VARK model in the undergraduate medical students. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2023;13(10):2049-54. [DOI]
9. Sulistyanto H, Nurkamto J, Akhyar M. A review of determining the learning style preferences by using computer-based questionnaires on undergraduate students. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2019 Mar 1 (Vol. 1175, No. 1, p. 012209). IOP Publishing. [DOI]
10. Kannan B, Shanmugavelu G, Arumugam S, Baskaran SM, Balakrishnan A, Parasuraman L. Students’ Learning styles in the classroom and it’s importance to educators in the teaching and learning process: An overview. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2021. [DOI]
11. Karatas E, Yalin HI. The impact of matching learning-teaching styles on students' academic achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2021;92:377-402. [DOI]
12. Masoumian Hosseini M, Ruhabadi F, Gazerani A, et al. Investigating the improvement of nursing students’ clinical competence through the mastery learning approach compared to the traditional method in the oncology department: a mixed-methods study. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2023;16(51):1-12. [DOI]
13. Ruhabadi F, Gazarani A, Gazarani A, Larki M. Effect of using crosswords on operating room students' learning in a Haematology course: a quasi experimental study. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2023;16(49):7-16. [DOI]
14. Schneider M, Preckel F. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin. 2017;143(6):565. [DOI]
15. Kovtun L, Zenenko N, Lapteva E. Effects of students learning styles on adaptive e-learning design. In2021 IEEE International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET) 2021 Jun 18 (pp. 184-190). IEEE. [DOI]
16. Cimermanová I. The effect of learning styles on academic achievement in different forms of teaching. International Journal of Instruction. 2018;11(3):219-32. [DOI]
17. Wilson ML. Students' learning style preferences and teachers' instructional strategies: Correlations between matched styles and academic achievement. Liberty University; 2011. [DOI]
18. Honicke T, Broadbent J, Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz M. Learner self-efficacy, goal orientation, and academic achievement: exploring mediating and moderating relationships. Higher Education Research & Development. 2020;39:689-703. [DOI]
19. Ning HK, Downing K. Influence of student learning experience on academic performance: the mediator and moderator effects of self-regulation and motivation. British Educational Research Journal. 2012;38:219-37. [DOI]
20. Rickard M, Sams DE, Mullis S, Sadasivan A. SoTL best practices: 21st century college students’ perceptions of learning styles and instructional design materials’ influence on the successful completion of assignments. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2023;17(1):10. [DOI]
21. Anasthasis YK. An analysis of kinds of teaching strategies in junior high school and the students' learning styles a thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for sarjana pendidikan degree in faculty of teacher training and education (doctoral dissertation, Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya).2016. [DOI]
22. Ridwan H, Sutresna I, Haryeti P. Teaching styles of the teachers and learning styles of the students. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2019 Oct 1 (Vol. 1318, No. 1, p. 012028). IOP Publishing. [DOI]
23. Damrongpanit S, Reungtragul A. Matching of learning styles and teaching styles: advantage and disadvantage on ninth-grade students' academic achievements. Educational Research and Review. 2013;8:1937-47. [DOI]
24. Kozlowski A, Kaliszewski A, Dabrowski J, Klimek H. Virtual network sampling method using LinkedIn. MethodsX 8: 101393. [DOI]
25. Baltar F, Brunet I. Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research. 2012;22(1):57-74. [DOI]
26. Wong JS, Chin KC. Reliability of the VARK questionnaire in Chinese nursing undergraduates. US-China Education Review. 2018;8(8):332-40. [DOI]
27. Ghasemi N, Rabi’ei M, Kalantari N, Abdi H. Psychometric propertics (factor structure, reliability and validity) of the modified kolb learning styles inventory (KLSI-V3. 1-2005) in Iranian students. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2015;7(6):361-7. [DOI]
28. Fitkov-Norris ED, Yeghiazarian A. Validation of VARK learning modalities questionnaire using Rasch analysis. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2015 Feb 1 (Vol. 588, No. 1, p. 012048). IOP Publishing. [DOI]
29. Kharb P, Samanta PP, Jindal M, Singh V. The learning styles and the preferred teaching-learning strategies of first year medical students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2013;7(6):1089-1092. [DOI]
30. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, et al. International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Quality of Life Research. 1992;1:349-51. [DOI]
31. Nilson LB, Zakrajsek TD. Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, 5th Edition. Wiley; 2023, 161-187. [Article]
32. Kell C, Deursen Rv. Student learning preferences reflect curricular change. Medical Teacher. 2002;24(1):32-40. [DOI]
33. Nasirzadeh F, Heidarzadeh A, Shirazi M, Farmanbar, R, Monfared, A. Assessing Learning Styles of Students in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2014;6(1):29-39. [DOI]
34. Quinn MM, Smith T, Kalmar EL, Burgoon JM. What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2018;11(4):358-365. [DOI]
35. Rappel LJ. Transforming thought through reflective experiential learning. Open Access Journal. 2018;2. [DOI]
36. Black S, Allen JD. Part 10: teacher behaviors. The Reference Librarian. 2019;60:212-25. [DOI]
37. Samms CL. Relationship between dissimilar cognitive styles, use of coping behavior and use of learning strategies [LSU Doctoral Dissertations]. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College; 2010. [DOI]
38. Bergmark U, Lundström S, Manderstedt L, Palo A. Why become a teacher? Student teachers’ perceptions of the teaching profession and motives for career choice. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2018;41(3):266-81. [DOI]
39. Meishar-Tal H, Shonfeld M. Students’ writing and reading preferences in a paperless classroom. Interactive Learning Environments. 2018;27:908-18. [DOI]
40. Mena Lorenzo JL, Rodríguez Pulido J, Mena Lorenzo JA, Navarro Guzmán FJ, Cabrera Guzmán JS. Estilos de aprendizaje del alumnado de ingeniería: curso, rendimiento y género. [DOI]
41. Masoumian Hosseini M, Sadat Manzari Z, Gazerani A, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Gazerani A, Rohaninasab M. Can gamified surgical sets improve surgical instrument recognition and student performance retention in the operating room? A multi-institutional experimental crossover study. BMC Medical Education. 2023;23(1):907. [DOI]
42. Yassin BM, Almasri MA. How to accommodate different learning styles in the same classroom: analysis of theories and methods of learning styles. Canadian Social Science. 2015;11(3):26. [DOI]
43. Velásquez GMB, Zambrano SJB, Meza OBR. Planned educational strategies based on learning styles: Case study PFM pedagogical-didactic induction. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences. 2022;9(2):274-80. [DOI]
44. Parul N, Sarin J, Sheoran P, Phanden RK. Alliance in Teaching-Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, p. 67–76. [DOI]
45. Riener C, Willingham D. The myth of learning styles. Change: The Magazine Of Higher Learning. 2010;42(5):32-5. [DOI]
46. Resmi C. Learning Styles: An Introspection into the major influential aspects on the learning process. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 2022;3(5):45-48. [DOI]
47. Nancekivell SE, Shah P, Gelman SA. Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience: toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2020;112(2):221-35. [DOI]
48. Rogowsky BA, Calhoun BM, Tallal P. Providing instruction based on students’ learning style preferences does not improve learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11. [DOI]
49. Burroughs N, Gardner J, Lee Y, et al. Teaching for excellence and equity: analyzing teacher characteristics, behaviors and student outcomes with TIMSS. Springer nature; 2019. [DOI]
50. Dismas S, Nzima I, Kimaro A. Competence-Based Curriculum in Tanzania: District School Quality Assurance Officers’ Understanding and Practices. International Journal of Educational Reform. [DOI]
51. Kazu, I. Y. The Effect of Learning Styles on Education and the Teaching Process. Journal of Social Sciences, 2009;5(2), 85-94. [https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.85.94]
52. Dunn R, Dunn K. Learning styles, teaching styles. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin. 1975;59(393):37-49. [DOI]
53. Capone R. Blended learning and student-centered active learning environment: a case study with STEM undergraduate students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. 2022;22(1):210-36. [DOI]
54. Guiwen J. A deep learning-oriented practical training course for computer application skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2023;18(6):28. [DOI]
55. Istenič Starčič A, Lebeničnik M. Investigation of university students' perceptions of their educators as role models and designers of digitalized curricula. Human Technology. 2020;16(1). [DOI]
56. Boland RJ, Amonoo HL. Types of learners. Psychiatric Clinics. 2021;44(2):141-8. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
