Sat, May 31, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 16, Issue 49 (2023)
JMED 2023, 16(49): 50-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: A-12-1918-1
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Thacker J, Shinde M, Ganjiwale J, Nimbalkar S. A survey to assess the understanding of healthcare research among the Indian undergraduate medical students. JMED 2023; 16 (49) :50-56
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1768-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1768-en.html
1- Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India , thackerjigar@yahoo.co.in
2- Central Research Service, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
3- Department of Neonatology, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
2- Central Research Service, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
3- Department of Neonatology, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
Abstract: (1742 Views)
Background & Objective: The concept of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and critical appraisal should be taught to undergraduate (UG) medical students so that future doctors can confidently assess the trustworthiness of the literature they read. In the current study, the understanding of biomedical research among Indian UG medical students was assessed.
Material & Methods: The Cross-sectional survey questionnaire as a Google form was circulated via online mode (WhatsApp, e-mail) in December 2020. Any UG medical students including interns from India could voluntarily participate. We aspired to get more than 601 responses as this was the minimum sample size calculated for our study, but we analyzed 715 responses. The questions of this self-made questionnaire were framed for assessing participants' attitudes and knowledge about healthcare research, EBM, and critical appraisal. The data were descriptively analyzed in frequency percentage. Chi2 tests were used to compare the association between categorical variables.
Results: Almost equal participation from all grades of the MBBS study, with almost equal gender distribution, and the mean (SD) age of the participants was 21.09(2.06) years. 22% wanted to do their post-graduation (PG) abroad. 59% surfed the internet for new subject knowledge. Teachers have never asked to refer to any journal for 66%. 14% have read journal articles at least once, with half of the understanding. No difference in biostatistics knowledge before and after its curricular teaching in Third MBBS part 1. Foreign PG aspirants were taking part in research activities more. 46% wanted to do training in critical appraisal, and 43% believed not having critical appraisal skills will affect their patient care.
Conclusions: Indian UG medical students lacked the skills of critical appraisal. There was a lack of motivation and support from teachers. This scenario needs to change with the systemic inclusion of the components of healthcare research and EBM in the curriculum.
Material & Methods: The Cross-sectional survey questionnaire as a Google form was circulated via online mode (WhatsApp, e-mail) in December 2020. Any UG medical students including interns from India could voluntarily participate. We aspired to get more than 601 responses as this was the minimum sample size calculated for our study, but we analyzed 715 responses. The questions of this self-made questionnaire were framed for assessing participants' attitudes and knowledge about healthcare research, EBM, and critical appraisal. The data were descriptively analyzed in frequency percentage. Chi2 tests were used to compare the association between categorical variables.
Results: Almost equal participation from all grades of the MBBS study, with almost equal gender distribution, and the mean (SD) age of the participants was 21.09(2.06) years. 22% wanted to do their post-graduation (PG) abroad. 59% surfed the internet for new subject knowledge. Teachers have never asked to refer to any journal for 66%. 14% have read journal articles at least once, with half of the understanding. No difference in biostatistics knowledge before and after its curricular teaching in Third MBBS part 1. Foreign PG aspirants were taking part in research activities more. 46% wanted to do training in critical appraisal, and 43% believed not having critical appraisal skills will affect their patient care.
Conclusions: Indian UG medical students lacked the skills of critical appraisal. There was a lack of motivation and support from teachers. This scenario needs to change with the systemic inclusion of the components of healthcare research and EBM in the curriculum.
Keywords: Evidence-based medicine, Critical appraisal, Research methodology, Medical Education, Undergraduate medical curriculum
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2022/11/10 | Accepted: 2023/03/5 | Published: 2023/03/27
Received: 2022/11/10 | Accepted: 2023/03/5 | Published: 2023/03/27
References
1. Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N; Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ. 2014;13;348- 3725. [DOI]
2. Möller R, Shoshan M. Does reality meet expectations? An analysis of medical students' expectations and perceived learning during mandatory research projects. BMC Medical Eduation. 2019;19(1):93. [DOI]
3. Gokani SA, Sharma E, Sharma T, et. al. Impact of a National Journal Club and Letter Writing Session on Improving Medical Students' Confidence with Critical Appraisal. Advances in Medical Education Practice. 2019;24;10:1081-1087. [DOI]
4. Manjali, Jifmi Jose; Gupta, Tejpal. Critical appraisal of a clinical research paper: What one needs to know. Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment. 2020;3(3): 545-551. [DOI]
5. Al-Jundi A, Sakka S. Critical Appraisal f Clinical Research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;11(5): 1-5. [DOI]
6. Lee AE, Ardissino M, Bednarczuk NF, et. al. Prospective assessment of a critical appraisal teaching programme on medical students' confidence and performance in appraising medical literature. Journal of Royal College of Physicians Edinburg. 2020;50(1):60-66. [DOI]
7. Windish DM, Huot SJ, Green ML. Medicine residents' understanding of the biostatistics and results in the medical literature. JAMA. 2007;5;298(9):1010-22. [DOI]
8. Garg R, Goyal S, Singh K. Lack of Research Amongst Undergraduate Medical Students in India: It's time to Act and Act Now. Indian Pediatrics. 2017;15;54(5):357-360. [DOI]
9. Mahajan R, Virk A, Saiyad S, et. al. Stages of Concern of Medical Faculty toward Adoption of Competency-based Medical Education in India: A Multicentric Survey. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research. 2022;12(2):87-94. [DOI]
10. Ponnaiah M, Bhatnagar T, Ganeshkumar P, et. al. Design and implementation challenges of massive open online course on research methods for Indian medical postgraduates and teachers -descriptive analysis of inaugural cycle. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):369. [DOI]
11. Jaunoo S, Adams HL. A Survey Showing the Need to Incorporate the Teaching of Critical Appraisal Skills in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research. 2016. [DOI]
12. Basheer A, Iqbal N, Alexander T et al. Introducing a course on Evidence Based Medicine for undergraduate medical students – experience from an Indian medical school. MedEdPublish. 2016; 5:153. [DOI]
13. Kaderli R, Burghardt L, Hansali C, et. al. A Students’ View of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Survey in Switzerland. Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery. 2012;1(1):1-7.
14. Hamdan A. Medical students still lack skills needed to practise evidence-based medicine. Journal of Royal Society of Medicine. 2012;105(8):324. [DOI]
15. Buchberger B, Mattivi JT, Schwenke C,et. al. Critical appraisal of RCTs by 3rd year undergraduates after short courses in EBM compared to expert appraisal. GMS Journal of Medical Education. 2018;35(2): 24. [DOI]
16. Al Shahrani AS. Development and evaluation of an evidence-based medicine module in the undergraduate medical curriculum. BMC Medical Education. 2020; 20(1):256. [DOI]
17. Basheer A, Iqbal N, Prabakaran S, et. al. Simulated Randomized Controlled Trial to Learn Critical Appraisal (SiRCA): A Randomized Controlled Study of Effectiveness Among Undergraduate Medical Students. Cureus. 2021; 1113(11):e19946. [DOI]
18. Daou D, Chakhtoura M, El-Yazbi A, et. al. Teaching critical appraisal to large classes of undergraduate medical students using team-based learning versus group discussions: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):77. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
