Sun, Jun 1, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 16, Issue 49 (2023)
JMED 2023, 16(49): 78-70 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.KMU.REC.1399.636
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Salajegheh M. Application of cognitive apprenticeship model in clinical education: A scoping review. JMED 2023; 16 (49) :78-70
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1687-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1687-en.html
Kerman University of Medical Sciences , mahla.salajeghe90@gmail.com
Abstract: (2281 Views)
Background & Objective: One of the main aspects of medical education is clinical education. Cognitive apprenticeship model as a principle of clinical education provides an opportunity for medical students to transform theoretical knowledge into a variety of cognitive, attitudinal, and psychomotor skills that are essential for patient care. The purpose of this study is to introduce the cognitive apprenticeship model, its dimensions, and its position in clinical education.
Materials and Methods: In this scoping review study, the keywords including Cognitive Apprenticeship Model, Clinical Teaching, and Medical Education were searched in Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Medline databases between 2009 and 2021. After removing duplicates and considering the direct relationship of the articles to the study’s aim, full texts were reviewed.
Results: A total of 170 records were found, out of which 15 articles were finally examined from three aspects including, introduction of cognitive apprenticeship model, position of cognitive apprenticeship model in clinical education, and evaluation of cognitive apprenticeship model. A cognitive apprenticeship model is a powerful tool for applying theoretical knowledge to clinical experiences and practicing skills through observation, participation, clinical reasoning, and independent clinical practice.
Conclusion: Developing the educational competencies of clinical faculty members and providing suitable opportunities for them to apply the dimensions of the cognitive apprenticeship model in clinical education has positive effects on the effort, perseverance, and future performance of students.
Materials and Methods: In this scoping review study, the keywords including Cognitive Apprenticeship Model, Clinical Teaching, and Medical Education were searched in Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Medline databases between 2009 and 2021. After removing duplicates and considering the direct relationship of the articles to the study’s aim, full texts were reviewed.
Results: A total of 170 records were found, out of which 15 articles were finally examined from three aspects including, introduction of cognitive apprenticeship model, position of cognitive apprenticeship model in clinical education, and evaluation of cognitive apprenticeship model. A cognitive apprenticeship model is a powerful tool for applying theoretical knowledge to clinical experiences and practicing skills through observation, participation, clinical reasoning, and independent clinical practice.
Conclusion: Developing the educational competencies of clinical faculty members and providing suitable opportunities for them to apply the dimensions of the cognitive apprenticeship model in clinical education has positive effects on the effort, perseverance, and future performance of students.
Article Type : Review |
Received: 2022/08/27 | Accepted: 2023/03/6 | Published: 2023/03/27
Received: 2022/08/27 | Accepted: 2023/03/6 | Published: 2023/03/27
References
1. Mortazavi S, Sharififard GR, Khoshgoftar MA. Factors Affecting the Quality of Clinical Education from the Perspective of Teachers and Learners of Saveh Hospitals in 2019: A Descriptive Study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2020;19(9):909-24. [DOI]
2. Jayasekara R, Smith C, Hall C, Rankin E, Smith M, Visvanathan V, et al. The effectiveness of clinical education models for undergraduate nursing programs: a systematic review. Nurse education in practice. 2018;29:116-26. [DOI]
3. Steinberg JS. The Benefits and Challenges of Patient-based Blood Pressure and Electrocardiogram Measurements at Home. The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2019;10(9):3839-41. [DOI]
4. Azimi N BR, Mousavi P, Bakhshandeh-Bavrsad M, Honarjoo M. The Study of Clinical Education Problems and Presenting Solutions for improvement its Quality in Midwifery. Research in Medical Education. 2017;8(4):43-51. [DOI]
5. Shahbazi S, Khoshnevisan MH, Malekmohammadi M, Ghorbani Z. Self-Reported Dental Public Health Competencies of Senior Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal Dental School; Vol. 2021;39(1):17-22. [DOI]
6. Shadadi H, Sheyback M, Balouchi A, Shoorvazi M. The barriers of clinical education in nursing: A systematic review. Biomedical Research. 2018;29(19):3616-23. [DOI]
7. Butler BA, Butler CM, Peabody TD. Cognitive apprenticeship in orthopaedic surgery: updating a classic educational model. Journal of Surgical Education. 2019;76(4):931-5. [DOI]
8. Gustafsson M, Engström AK, Ohlsson U, Sundler AJ, Bisholt B. Nurse teacher models in clinical education from the perspective of student nurses—A mixed method study. Nurse education today. 2015;35(12):1289-94. [DOI]
9. Bragg DD, Eddy PL, Iverson ER, Hao Y, O'Connell K. Lessons from research and evaluation on faculty as change agents of teaching and campus reform. New Directions for Community Colleges. 2022;2022(199):215-28. [DOI]
10. Van Der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth L, Driessen E, Govaerts M, Heeneman S. Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Medical teacher. 2015;37(7):641-6. [DOI]
11. Matsuo M, Tsukube T. A review on cognitive apprenticeship in educational research: Application for management education. The International Journal of Management Education. 2020;18(3):100417. [DOI]
12. Tsukube T, Matsuo M. The impact of cognitive apprenticeship on the perceived growth of junior doctors. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2020;32(7):489-99. [DOI]
13. Wu Y-T, Shen P-D, Lin C-H. The Effects of Cognitive Apprenticeship and Co-Regulated Learning on Improving Student Computer Problem-Solving Skills and Learning Motivation: A Quasi-Experiment in an “Applied Information Technology: Office Software” Course. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI). 2022;18(1):1-16. [DOI]
14. Lyons K, McLaughlin JE, Khanova J, Roth MT. Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2017;22:723-39. [DOI]
15. Minshew LM, Olsen AA, McLaughlin JE. Cognitive apprenticeship in STEM graduate education: A qualitative review of the literature. AERA Open. 2021;7:23328584211052044. [DOI]
16. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal. 2009;26(2):91-108. [DOI]
17. Herlambang H, Fitri AD, Shafira NNA, Puspasari A, Tarawifa S. The Role of Clinical Supervision: Teaching Basic Obstetric Ultrasound for Undergraduate Medical Students. Indonesian Research Journal in Education| IRJE. 2020:556-68. [DOI]
18. Amini M, Rezaee M, Badiee R, Kojouri J, Lotfi F. Evaluating the clinical faculty members of Shahid Faghighi hospital, Shiraz, based on the cognitive apprenticeship model in january 2011. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2012;2(4):1-10. [DOI]
19. Toh RQE, Koh KK, Lua JK, Wong RSM, Quah ELY, Panda A, et al. The role of mentoring, supervision, coaching, teaching and instruction on professional identity formation: a systematic scoping review. BMC medical education. 2022;22(1):1-14. [DOI]
20. Almasi H ZE, Delavar A, Nili ahmadabadi M. Designing and validating the training model of internship based on theory of cognitive apprenticeship for the implementation of the internship course in Farhangian University. Educational Psychology. 2020;16(56):1-30. [DOI]
21. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Scherpbier AJ. Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students? Advances in health sciences education. 2009;14(4):535-46. [DOI]
22. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Snellen-Balendong HA, van Santen-Hoeufft M, Wolfhagen IH, Scherpbier AJ. Clinical teaching based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship: views of experienced clinical teachers. Academic Medicine. 2013;88(6):861-5. [DOI]
23. Tariq M, Iqbal S, Haider SI, Abbas A. Using the cognitive apprenticeship model to identify learning strategies that learners view as effective in ward rounds. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2021;97(1143):5-9. [DOI]
24. Mirzaei K ZS, Jalalpour SH. Evaluation of medical students from clinical professors of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences based on the cognitive model of teacher-student. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2014;9(13):329. [Article]
25. Bartlett AD, Um IS, Luca EJ, Krass I, Schneider CR. Measuring and assessing the competencies of preceptors in health professions: a systematic scoping review. BMC medical education. 2020;20(1):1-9. [DOI]
26. Ramackers W, Stupak JV, Marcheel IL, Tuffs A, Schrem H, Fischer V, et al. Regression analyses of questionnaires in bedside teaching. BMC medical education. 2020;20(1):1-9. [Article]
27. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(11):1732-8. /ACM.0b013e3181f554d6. [DOI]
28. Boerboom TB, Dolmans D, Jaarsma A, Muijtjens A, Van Beukelen P, Scherpbier A. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers’ supervisory skills during clinical rotations. Medical teacher. 2011;33(2):e84-e91. [DOI]
29. Boerboom TB, Mainhard T, Dolmans DH, Scherpbier AJ, Van Beukelen P, Jaarsma AC. Evaluating clinical teachers with the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire: How much ‘teacher’is in student ratings? Medical teacher. 2012;34(4):320-6. /0142159X.2012.660220. [DOI]
30. Giannasi SE, Durante E, Vázquez FR, Kecskes CE, Ladenheim R, Brailovsky CA. Transcultural validation of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria. 2019;117(4):e425-e32. [DOI]
31. Konishi E, Saiki T, Kamiyama H, Nishiya K, Tsunekawa K, Imafuku R, et al. Improved cognitive apprenticeship clinical teaching after a faculty development program. Pediatrics International. 2020;62(5):542-8. [DOI]
32. Al Ansari A, Tabbara KS. Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire in Bahrain. Oman Medical Journal. 2019;34(5):427-33. [DOI]
33. Rodino AM, Wolcott MD. Assessing preceptor use of cognitive apprenticeship: is the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire (MCTQ) a useful approach? Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2019;31(5):506-18. [DOI]
34. Yosefi MR JM. The View of Medical Intern Students in Achievement Clinical Competency with Learning Mastery Approach in Gorgan school of Medicine: Qualitative Study. Medical Education Journal. 2021;9(1):30-45. [DOI]
35. Asgari P, Mahmoudi M, Bahramnezhad F, Rafiei F, Khajeh-Goodari M. Comparison of the effect of three methods of education (Inquirybased bedside education and routine approach to clinical education) on critical care nursing students clinical learning. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2016;13(2):133-41. [DOI]
36. Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Key tips for teaching in the clinical setting. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(2):1-7. [DOI]
37. Pelaccia T, Viau R. Motivation in medical education. Medical teacher. 2017;39(2):136-40. [DOI]
38. Feinstein RE. Descriptions and reflections on the cognitive apprenticeship model of psychotherapy training & supervision. Journal of contemporary psychotherapy. 2021;51(2):155-64. [DOI]
39. Veresov NN. Discovering the Great Royal Seal: New Reality of Vygotsky’s Legacy. Cultural-historical psychology. 2020;16(2):40-50. [DOI]
40. Eun B. Two diverging paths toward a common destination: The dialogism of Vygotsky and Bakhtin. Culture & Psychology. 2019;25(4):484-502. [DOI]
41. Chaiklin S. The meaning and origin of the activity concept in Soviet psychology—with primary focus on AN Leontiev’s approach. Theory & Psychology. 2019;29(1):3-26. [DOI]
42. Mukhalalati BA, Taylor A. Adult learning theories in context: a quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of medical education and curricular development. 2019;6:1-10. [DOI]
43. Omidkhoda A, Dehdarirad H, Changizi V. Planning, Implementation and Evaluation of Active Learning-Teaching Methods in Inverted Classroom, Peer Learning and Virtual Education among Students in the School of Allied Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2021;13(3):42-54. [DOI]
44. Woolley NN, Jarvis Y. Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: A model for teaching and learning clinical skills in a technologically rich and authentic learning environment. Nurse education today. 2007;27(1):73-9. [DOI]
45. Austin AE. Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education. International Journal for Academic Development. 2009;14(3):173-83. [DOI]
46. Salajegheh M, Bahmanbijari B, Shokouhi M, Safipour Afshar A, Beigzadeh A. Educational Environment Assessment at Outpatient Clinics in Teaching Hospitals of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran, from Resident's Perspective Based on the ACLEEM Questionnaire. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2015;12(Supplement):119-30. [DOI]
47. Abasi Z, Amine A, Gholame H. Effective factors on clinical education from student's and teacher's viewpoint (systematic review). Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2013;4(4):709-20. [DOI]
48. Salajegheh M. Organizational impact of faculty development programs on the medical teacher's competencies. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2021;10(430):1-5. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
