Volume 19, Issue 2 (2026)                   J Med Edu Dev 2026, 19(2): 49-57 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.NUMS.REC.1401.022

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Andishmand Z, Babaei K, Moghadampasha A, Ali-Abadi T, Alinejad Mofrad S, Khaleghipour M et al . The effectiveness of Henderson's resilience model on self-efficacy and psychological distress among nursing students: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Edu Dev 2026; 19 (2) :49-57
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2594-en.html
1- Counseling center, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
2- Department of Anesthesia, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, iran
3- Department of Nursing, Neyshabur, University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran , tayebealiabadi@yahoo.com
4- School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, South Western Sydney Campus, Australia
5- Department of Anesthesia, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.
6- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.
Abstract:   (78 Views)
Background & Objective: Nursing students often experience psychological distress, which can negatively affect their academic performance and well-being. Effective interventions that build resilience and self-efficacy are needed. Henderson's resilience model, which highlights the role of educational quality in fostering resilience, offers a useful framework. This study aimed to assess whether Henderson's resilience model could reduce psychological distress and improve academic self-efficacy and resilience in nursing students.
Materials & Methods: We carried out a single-blind randomized controlled trial with 36 nursing students, who were stratified into intervention (n = 18) and control (n = 18) groups. After attrition (three withdrawals, one incomplete questionnaire), the final sample included 17 students in the intervention group and 15–16 in the control group. Outcomes were measured using the Nursing Student Academic Resilience Inventory, the College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests (with Welch's correction where needed) and chi-square tests in SPSS version 18.
Results: Baseline scores did not differ significantly between groups. At post-test, the intervention group showed significantly lower psychological distress (DASS mean difference = -9.27, 95% CI = -15.88 to -2.66; Welch's t = -2.900, df = 22.91, p = 0.008; Cohen's d = 1.03) and higher resilience (NSARI mean difference = +8.15, 95% CI = 1.35 to 14.95; Welch's t = 2.446, df = 30.02, p = 0.021; Cohen's d = 0.85). Academic self-efficacy also improved significantly in the intervention group (CASES mean difference = +13.65, 95% CI = 2.61 to 24.69; Welch's t = 2.525, df = 29.96, p = 0.017; Cohen's d = 0.88).
Conclusion: In this study, a structured 10‑week program based on Henderson's resilience model was associated with reduced psychological distress and improved resilience and academic self‑efficacy among nursing students. Larger, multi‑site trials with longer follow‑up are recommended to confirm these findings.

 
Full-Text [PDF 643 kb]   (20 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (8 Views)  
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2025/09/17 | Accepted: 2026/02/22 | Published: 2026/04/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Medical Education Development | All rights reserved.