Fri, May 17, 2024
[Archive]
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kuala Lumpur Royal college of Medicine Perak
Abstract: (1085 Views)
Background & Objective: Cross-border medical student mobility and doctor migration have become global trends. The aim of this study was to explore Malaysian medical students’ attitudes towards studying and working overseas.
Material & Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students of the academic year 2018–2019 from University Kuala Lumpur, Royal College of Medicine Perak, using a self-administered validated questionnaire that explored their opinions related to encouraging and deterring factors of studying and working overseas and their preferred destination for migration. All 569 students from years 1 to 5 were invited, and 505 completed responses were analyzed.
Results: Financial factors were rated as most relevant for not studying overseas by 81.6% of the respondents, whereas language barriers and racial discrimination were considered less relevant. Doing electives overseas was favored by 68.9%. Regarding the benefits of further study abroad, learning international standards and experiencing diversity are rated as “very important” by 75.4% and 62.7%, respectively. They rated better earning (63.2%) and further learning (30.7%) as the most relevant reasons for doctors working overseas, and family commitment (49.9%), medical licensing examinations (MLE) (38.4%), and loyalty to their home country (34.7%) for not working overseas. Their most preferred foreign destinations for further study and working are the UK, Ireland, and Australia.
Conclusion: While appreciating the advantages of further study abroad, MLE was considered one of the deterring factors. As a result, consideration should be given to making changes to existing curricula to align with the expected standards of the destined countries.
Material & Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students of the academic year 2018–2019 from University Kuala Lumpur, Royal College of Medicine Perak, using a self-administered validated questionnaire that explored their opinions related to encouraging and deterring factors of studying and working overseas and their preferred destination for migration. All 569 students from years 1 to 5 were invited, and 505 completed responses were analyzed.
Results: Financial factors were rated as most relevant for not studying overseas by 81.6% of the respondents, whereas language barriers and racial discrimination were considered less relevant. Doing electives overseas was favored by 68.9%. Regarding the benefits of further study abroad, learning international standards and experiencing diversity are rated as “very important” by 75.4% and 62.7%, respectively. They rated better earning (63.2%) and further learning (30.7%) as the most relevant reasons for doctors working overseas, and family commitment (49.9%), medical licensing examinations (MLE) (38.4%), and loyalty to their home country (34.7%) for not working overseas. Their most preferred foreign destinations for further study and working are the UK, Ireland, and Australia.
Conclusion: While appreciating the advantages of further study abroad, MLE was considered one of the deterring factors. As a result, consideration should be given to making changes to existing curricula to align with the expected standards of the destined countries.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2023/09/11 | Accepted: 2024/01/5
Received: 2023/09/11 | Accepted: 2024/01/5
References
1. Wu A, Leask B, Choi E, Unangst L, de Wit H. Internationalization of medical education-A scoping review of the current status in the United States. Medical Science Educator. 2020; 30(1): 1693-1705. [DOI]
2. Bourke A. A model of the determinants of international trade in higher education. Service Industries Journal. 2000; 20(1):110-38. [DOI]
3. Lewis W. Study abroad influencing factors: An investigation of socio-economic status, social, cultural, and personal factors. Ursidae: The Undergraduate Research Journal at the University of Northern Colorado. 2016;5(3):6.
4. Huhn D, Huber J, Ippen FM, et al. International medical students’ expectations and worries at the beginning of their medical education: a qualitative focus group study. BMC Medical Education. 2016;16(1):1-8. [DOI]
5. Yang P, Baildon M, Sim JB. Educational mobility and citizenship: Chinese “foreign talent” students in Singapore and Indian medical students in China. The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. 2020. P: 633-47. [DOI]
6. Thompson MJ, Huntington MK, Hunt DD, Pinsky LE, Brodie JJ. Educational effects of international health electives on US and Canadian medical students and residents: a literature review. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(3):342-7. [DOI]
7. Drain PK, Primack A, Hunt DD, Fawzi WW, Holmes KK, Gardner P. Global health in medical education: a call for more training and opportunities. Academic Medicine. 2007;82(3):226-30. [DOI]
8. Khasawneh R, Seeling J, Russo CN, et al. Migration patterns of undergraduate medical students in elective exchanges: a prospective online survey. The Lancet Global Health. 2019;7:S29. [DOI]
9. O’Donnell P, McAuliffe E, Diarmuid OD. Unchallenged good intentions: a qualitative study of the experiences of medical students on international health electives to developing countries. Human Resources for Health. 2014;12(1):1-8. [DOI]
10. Khor S K. 2019. Southeast Asia’s Big Export to the World: Health Professionals. [Online]. [accessed 2021 June 17]. Available from: [Article]
11. Mullan F. The metrics of the physician brain drain. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353(17):1810-8. [DOI]
12. Hawthorne L. International medical migration–what is the future for Australia?. Medical Journal of Australia Open Access. 2012;1:18-21. [DOI]
13. Lim VK. Medical education in Malaysia. Medical Teacher. 2008;30(2):119-23. [DOI]
14. Wong RS, Abdul Kadir SY. Medical education in Malaysia: quality versus
15. quantity. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2017;6(1):10-11. [DOI]
16. Waterval D, Frambach JM, Scott SM, et al. Crossborder curriculum partnerships: medical students’ experiences on critical aspects. BMC Medical Education. 2018; 18(1):1-9. [DOI]
17. Doyle S. Changing flows and directions for international education and mobilities in selected Asian countries: Turning to look at Asia from a New Zealand perspective. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies. 2016;18(2):13-28.
18. Cheng MY, Mahmood A, Yeap PF. Malaysia as a regional education hub: a demand-side analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2013;35(5):523-36. [DOI]
19. Malau-Aduli BS. Exploring the experiences and coping strategies of international medical students. BMC Medical Education. 2011;11(1):1-2. [DOI]
20. Henning MA, Krägeloh C, Moir F, Doherty I, Hawken SJ. Quality of life: international and domestic students studying medicine in New Zealand. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2012;1(3):129-42. [DOI]
21. Ngoo YT, Tey NP, Tan EC. Determinants of life satisfaction in Asia. Social Indicators Research. 2015;124(1):141-56. [DOI]
22. Tananuraksakul N. An Exploratory Investigation of asian students sense of dignity in a non-native English language learning context: A case study. Journal of Intercultural Communication. 2009(19):1-9. [DOI]
23. Khanal J, Gaulee U. Challenges of international students from pre-departure to post-study: A literature review. Journal of International Students. 2019;9(2):560-81. [DOI]
24. Mosbah A, Razak A, Al-Jubari I. Students and cultural issues in international contexts: The case of Malaysian international businesses students in UK and China. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. 2019;5(2):573-90.
25. Henning MA, Krägeloh C, Moir F, Doherty I, Hawken SJ. Quality of life: international and domestic students studying medicine in New Zealand. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2012;1(3):129-42. [DOI]
26. Swami V. Predictors of sociocultural adjustment among sojourning Malaysian tudents in Britain. International Journal of Psychology. 2009 ;44(4):266-73. [DOI]
27. Dos Santos LM. Study abroad and student exchange experiences of international students: The sociocultural and psychological racism perspective. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2022;11(1):15-28. [DOI]
28. Imafuku R, Saiki T, Hayakawa K, Sakashita K, Suzuki Y. Rewarding journeys: exploring medical students’ learning experiences in international electives. Medical Education Online. 2021;26(1):1913784. [DOI]
29. Neel AF, AlAhmari LS, Alanazi RA, et al. Medical students’ perception of international health electives in the undergraduate medical curriculum at the College of medicine, King Saud university. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2018; 9:811-817. [DOI]
30. Ahsin S & Saeed GN . Medical electives: Students perspective. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2016; 66: 404-408.
31. Whitla DK, Orfield G, Silen W, Teperow C, Howard C, Reede J. Educational benefits of diversity in medical school: a survey of students. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(5):460-6. [DOI]
32. Adeniyi MA, Efuntoye O, Popoola G, et al. Profile and determinants of intention to migrate by early career doctors in Nigeria: A report from CHARTING study. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2022; 37(3)1512-1525. [DOI]
33. Adebayo A, Akinyemi OO. “What are you really doing in this country?”: Emigration intentions of Nigerian doctors and their policy implications for human resource for health management. Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2021;15:1-20. [DOI]
34. Domagała A, Dubas-Jakóbczyk K. Migration intentions among physicians working in Polish hospitals–Insights from survey research. Health Policy. 2019;123(8):782-9. [DOI]
35. Suciu ŞM, Popescu CA, Ciumageanu MD, Buzoianu AD. Physician migration at its roots: a study on the emigration preferences and plans among medical students in Romania. Human Resources for Health. 2017;15(1):1-9. [DOI]
36. Ossai EN, Una AF, Onyenakazi RC, Nwonwu EU. Emigration plans after graduation of clinical medical students of Ebonyi state university Abakaliki, Nigeria: Implications for policy. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;23(7):995-1003. [DOI]
37. Lanati M, Thiele R. Aid for health, economic growth, and the emigration of medical workers. Journal of International Development. 2021;33(7):1112-40. [DOI]
38. Abd Razak AZ, Omar CM, Yunus JN. Family issues and work-family conflict among medical officers in Malaysian public hospitals. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2010;1(1):26-36.
39. Harun I, Mahmood R, Som HM. Role stressors and turnover intention among doctors in Malaysian public hospitals: work–family conflict and work engagement as mediators. PSU Research Review. 2022; 6(1):1-6. [DOI]
40. Vuong B, Tung D, Tushar H, Quan T, Giao H. Determinates of factors influencing job satisfaction and organizational loyalty. Management Science Letters. 2021;11(1):203-12. [DOI]
41. Leung TI, Biskup E, DeWitt D. Facilitating credentialing and engagement of international physician-migrants during the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Rural and Remote Health. 2020;20(3). [DOI]
42. Peterson BD, Pandya SS, Leblang D. Doctors with borders: occupational licensing as an implicit barrier to high skill migration. Public Choice. 2014;160(1):45-63. [DOI]
43. Schumann M, Maaz A, Peters H. Doctors on the move: a qualitative study on the driving factors in a group of Egyptian physicians migrating to Germany. Globalization and Health. 2019;15(1):1-9. [DOI]
44. Hawthorne L. International health workforce mobility and its implications in the Western Pacific region. 2015. 1-93.
45. Lafortune G, Socha-Dietrich K, Vickstrom E. Recent trends in international mobility of doctors and nurses. Recent trends in international migration of doctors, nurses and medical students. 2019:11–34.
46. Chur-Hansen A. Returning home to work: Malaysian students who studied medicine overseas. Medical Teacher. 2004;26(4):343-8. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
