Fri, Oct 18, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 17, Issue 55 (2024)
JMED 2024, 17(55): 31-39 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.KMU.REC.1398.391
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Amirafzali Nasab M, Nouhi E. The impact of simulated operating rooms in a clinical skill center on operating room students’ skills and satisfaction: A semi experimental study. JMED 2024; 17 (55) :31-39
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1940-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1940-en.html
Nursing Reaserch Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Abstract: (118 Views)
Background & Objective: The operating room is a highly complex and stressful environment. Direct training in this environment may have detrimental effects on employees' performance and students' learning. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the impact of simulated operating rooms at clinical skill centers on the skills and satisfaction of operating room students at Jiroft and Bam Universities of Medical Sciences.
Material & Methods: In this semi experimental study, 40 operating room students in the fourth semester of the bachelor's program at Jiroft and Bam Universities of Medical Sciences participated. The students were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention involved utilizing the operating room simulation at the clinical skill center. The data were collected using the Clinical Skill and Teaching Satisfaction Questionnaires and analyzed using Analysis Of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The results of the study showed a significant increase in the skills and satisfaction of students in the intervention group, with respective scores of 87.82 ± 11.21 and 93.5 ± 14 compared to the control group scores of 53.94 ± 8.98 and 83.064 ± 9.69 (p < 0.001). The eta-squared (η) on the post-test revealed that 0.25 and 0.19 of the changes in the dependent variable were due to the independent variable (training in the simulated operating room).
Conclusion: The study's results indicate that simulating operating rooms at clinical skill centers can contribute to improving surgical technologist students' skills and satisfaction. Therefore, the simulated operating room can be used as an effective and safe educational method to enhance operating room students' practical skills.
Material & Methods: In this semi experimental study, 40 operating room students in the fourth semester of the bachelor's program at Jiroft and Bam Universities of Medical Sciences participated. The students were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention involved utilizing the operating room simulation at the clinical skill center. The data were collected using the Clinical Skill and Teaching Satisfaction Questionnaires and analyzed using Analysis Of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The results of the study showed a significant increase in the skills and satisfaction of students in the intervention group, with respective scores of 87.82 ± 11.21 and 93.5 ± 14 compared to the control group scores of 53.94 ± 8.98 and 83.064 ± 9.69 (p < 0.001). The eta-squared (η) on the post-test revealed that 0.25 and 0.19 of the changes in the dependent variable were due to the independent variable (training in the simulated operating room).
Conclusion: The study's results indicate that simulating operating rooms at clinical skill centers can contribute to improving surgical technologist students' skills and satisfaction. Therefore, the simulated operating room can be used as an effective and safe educational method to enhance operating room students' practical skills.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2023/05/14 | Accepted: 2024/02/26 | Published: 2024/09/10
Received: 2023/05/14 | Accepted: 2024/02/26 | Published: 2024/09/10
References
1. Ericsson KA. Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Academic Medicine. 2015;90(11):1471-86. [DOI]
2. Amiri M, Khademian Z, Nikandish R. The effect of nurse empowerment educational program on patient safety culture: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 2018;18(1):1-8. [DOI]
3. Burton R, Hope A. Simulation based education and expansive learning in health professional education: a discussion. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching. 2018;1(1):25-34. [DOI]
4. Becker V, Jedlicska N, Scheide L, et al. Changes in medical students and anesthesia technician trainees attitudes towards interprofessionality–experience from an interprofessional simulation-based course. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):1-14. [DOI]
5. Alfredsdottir H, Bjornsdottir K. Nursing and patient safety in the operating room. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;61(1):29-37. [DOI]
6. Escudero E, Silva M, Corvetto M. Simulation: a training resource for quality care and improving patient safety. Nursing-New Perspectives. 2019. [DOI]
7. Eyikara E, Baykara ZG. The Importance of simulation in nursing education. World Journal on Educational Technology. 2017;9(1):2-7. [Article]
8. Ostadhasanloo H, Mahmoodi F, Adib Y, Zamanzadeh V. Lived experiences of nursing students concerning education in simulated learning environments: a phenomenological study. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2022;15(45):44-53. [DOI]
9. Mohammadi G, Tourdeh M, Ebrahimian A. Effect of simulation-based training method on the psychological health promotion in operating room students during the educational internship. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2019;8:172. [DOI]
10. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(20):1928-37. [DOI]
11. Hammoud MM, Nuthalapaty FS, Goepfert AR, et al. To the point: medical education review of the role of simulators in surgical training. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;199(4):338-43. [DOI]
12. Pupkiewicz J, Kitson A, Perry J. What factors within the peri-operative environment influence the training of scrub nurses? Nurse education in practice. 2015;15(5):373-80. [DOI]
13. 13.Zha o Y, McDonell V, Samuelsen S. Assessment of the combustion performance of a room furnace operating on pipeline natural gas mixed with simulated biogas or hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(19):11368-79. [DOI]
14. Makary MA, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB, et al. Operating room briefings and wrong-site surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2007;204(2):236-43. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.10.018]
15. Zadi O, Nasiri E, Bazari Z, Asadpour H. Factors affecting on quality of clinical education from perspectives of operating room and anesthesiology students at Mazandaran university of medical sciences in 2018. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2020;13(4):335-41.
16. Paige JT, Arora S, Fernandez G, Seymour N. Debriefing 101: training faculty to promote learning in simulation-based training. The American Journal of Surgery. 2015;209(1):126-31. [DOI]
17. Torabizadeh C, Darari F, Yektatalab S. Operating room nurses’ perception of professional values. Nursing Ethics. 2019;26(6):1765-76. [DOI]
18. Ugur E, Kara S, Yildirim S, Akbal E. Medical errors and patient safety in the operating room. Age. 2016;33(6.53):19-50. [PubMed]
19. Weaver SJ, Salas E, Lyons R, et al. Simulation-based team training at the sharp end: A qualitative study of simulation-based team training design, implementation, and evaluation in healthcare. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock. 2010;3(4):369-77. [DOI]
20. Ebadi M, Sharififar ST, Baniyaghoobi F, Pishgoie A. Comparison of nursing students’ Satisfaction about two methods of demonstration and simulation for training of mask making against chemical attacks. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2016;9(1):63-70.
21. Sadeghnezhad H, Khazaei T, Nasiri A. Comparing the effect of concept mapping to clinical simulation on emergency medical studentsclinical decision making. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(3):241-51.
22. Erfanian F, Khadivzadeh T. The effects of simulation based and traditional education on students'skill in pelvic examination. Journal of Internal Medicine Today. 2008;14(2):61-9. [DOI]
23. Leighton K, Kardong-Edgren S, Gilbert GE. Are traditional and simulated clinical environments meeting nursing students’ learning needs? Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;59:85-93. [DOI]
24. Khazaei J, Zarouj H, Abbasi A. Qualification of clinical education of operation room in Bachelor degree from the perspective of students and educators in this field at the university of medical sciences, in Semnan. Journal of Education and Ethics in Nursing. 2014;3(3):39–46.
25. Mahdavi R, Pooladi S, Bahreini M, Motamed N. Designing and determining the psychometric properties of the clinical skills questionnaire for operating room nursing students. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2017;14(3):1-7.
26. Borim Nejad L, Sajadi Hezaveh M, Khosravi S. The effect of learning contract on self-directed learning and satisfaction of nursing students in clinical education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2015;14(12):1084-92. [DOI]
27. Shahbazian B, Montazeri A, Abbasi A. The impact of educational software designed on operating room students' learning of practical skills. Research in Medical Education. 2015;7(4):13-9. [DOI]
28. Khatooni M, Alimoradi Z, Samiei-Seiboni F, Shafiei Z, Atashi V. The impact of an educational software designed about fundamental of nursing skills on nursing students' learning of practical skills. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2014;3(1):9-16. [Article]
29. Hung CC, Kao HF, Liu HC, Liang HF, Chu TP, Lee BO. Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing students' perceived competence, self-efficacy, and learning satisfaction: a repeat measurement method. Nurse Education Today. 2021 Feb 1;97:104725. [DOI]
30. Liu F, Wang L, Zhao J, et al. Research on the application of cross-specialty education and situational simulation teaching in operation nursing practice teaching. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2021Jun;9(6):68-73. [DOI]
31. Hunter S, Katz D, Goldberg A, et al. Use of an anaesthesia workstation barrier device to decrease contamination in a simulated operating room. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;118(6):870-5. [DOI]
32. Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating: simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2005;26(2):96-103. [PubMed]
33. Yule S, Parker SH, Wilkinson J, et al. Coaching non-technical skills improves surgical residents’ performance in a simulated operating room. Journal of Surgical Education. 2015;72(6):1124-30. [DOI]
34. Tajabadi A, Davoodvand S, Mohammadi S. Consequences of exposure to clinical learning challenges among operating room students. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2024;16(52):37-44. [DOI]
35. Rajaguru V, Park J. Contemporary integrative review in simulation-based learning in nursing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(2):1-12. [DOI]
36. Azarabad S, Zaman SS, Nouri B, Valiee S. Frequency, causes and reporting barriers of nursing errors in the operating room students. Research in Medical Education. 2018;10(2):18-27. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
