Volume 17, Issue 53 (2024)                   JMED 2024, 17(53): 1-8 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: JKEtika 4/20 (3)

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sefein M, Zaigham M T, Idrees Z, Shahzil M. Pedagogical practices that enhance medical students' capacity for creative thought: A qualitative study. JMED 2024; 17 (53) :1-8
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1930-en.html
University Malaysia Sabah
Abstract:   (955 Views)
Background & Objective: In the medical field, there is a growing emphasis on fostering creativity and innovation in medical students to prepare them for the unpredictable nature of patient care. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of both lecturers and medical students on the current teaching practices and their influence on the development of creative thinking skills
Materials & Methods: The study was conducted as qualitative research at the Malaysian Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences and included a purposeful sample of eight medical students and seven lecturers. Data were gathered through individual semi-structured interviews held via the Google Meet platform and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.
Results: The findings indicate that learner-centred approaches, such as problem-solving exercises and group discussions, seminars, debates, and dramas have a positive impact on enhancing their creative thinking abilities. The use of technology-assisted teaching methods, including e-learning and simulation labs, was also perceived as inspiring, however, limitations in technical infrastructure were noted. Challenging activities like assignments, games, competitions, and online tests encourage creative learning.  Hands-on activities, such as bedside teaching and clinical skill learning, are also valuable in learning clinical skills in unique ways, but their effectiveness could be reduced by environmental and personal factors. Furthermore, practicing para-curriculum activities in a supportive and relaxed learning environment was identified as fostering a culture of original thought.
Conclusion: This study suggests that a comprehensive approach to medical education that integrates creative pedagogy can be instrumental in fostering creativity in medical students. Providing opportunities for creative thinking through workshops and addressing technical infrastructure limitations in technology-assisted teaching methods could be considered in enhancing the creative curricula in the South East region. The findings underline the importance of a learner-centered approach and a supportive learning atmosphere in promoting creative learning.
Full-Text [PDF 390 kb]   (395 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (302 Views)  
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2023/05/1 | Accepted: 2023/10/20 | Published: 2024/04/16

1. Gaspar D, Mabic M. Creativity in higher education. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(9): 598-605. [DOI]
2. Gruszka A, Tang M. The 4P's creativity model and its application in different fields. 2017; World Scientific. [DOI]
3. Hontvedt M, Silseth K, Wittek L. Professional collaboration in teacher support teams: A study of teacher and nurse educators’ creative problem-solving in a shared space for professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2021; 65(2): 240-257. [DOI]
4. Dehaan RL. Teaching creativity and inventive problem-solving in science. CBE Life Sciences Education. 2009;8(3):172-181. [DOI]
5. Kim Y, Lee et al. Creativity in medical education: Concepts related to creative capacity. Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine. 2020; 37(2): 79-83. [DOI]
6. Mesko B, Győrffy Z. The rise of the empowered physician in the digital health. 2019; 21(3): e12490. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Shaheen R. Creativity and education. Creative Education. 2010; 1(3): 166-169. [DOI]
8. Andersson A. Seven major challenges for e-learning in developing countries: Case study eBIT, Sri Lanka. e-learning. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology. 2008; 4: 63-77. [Article]
9. Lee JH, Portillo et al. Insights Into Three Frames of Creative Minds: Igniting Perspective Transformation Among First-Year University Students. SAGE Publications. 2019. 18(6): 1-12. [DOI]
10. Amabile TM, Pillemer J. Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Wiley. 2012. [DOI]
11. Tan OS. Flourishing creativity: Education in an age of wonder. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2015; 16(2): 161-166. [DOI]
12. Kendler KS. The nature of psychiatric disorders. wiley. 2016; 15(1):5-12. [DOI]
13. Lin SY. Fostering creativity through education-A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education. 2011; 2(3): 149-155.
14. Ibragimkyzy S, Slambekova TS, et al. Problemas de desenvolvimento da criatividade pedagógica [Problems of developing pedagogical creativity]. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016; 11(12): 5290-5298. [DOI]
15. Joshi A. Creative pedagogy applied to pharmacology teaching. Allied Academies. 2018; 2(2): 1-5. [DOI]
16. Diki D. international collaboration of distance learning universities for online learning in indonesia. Claremont Colleges Library. 2013; 2(1): 1-8. [DOI]
17. Bahrarom S. Teach and learn science through PBL: A teaching and learning resource for PBL in teacher education. Perak, Malaysia. 2011.
18. Beghetto RA, Anderson RC. Positive creativity is principled creativity. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(3): 184. [DOI]
19. Jeffrey B, Craft A. Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies. 2004; 30(1): 77-87. [DOI]
20. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77-101. [DOI]
21. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design. Sage. 2013.
22. Walsh F. Family resilience: A developmental systems framework. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2016; 13(3): 313-324. [DOI]
23. Handfield-Jones R, Nasmith et al. Creativity in medical education: The use of innovative techniques in clinical teaching. Medical Teacher. 1993; 15(1): 3-10. [DOI]
24. Mourad A, Jurjus et al. The what or the how: A review of teaching tools and methods in medical education. Medical Science Educator. 2016; 26(4): 723-728. [DOI]
25. Colliver JA. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula. Academic Medicine. 2000; 75(3): 259-266. [DOI]
26. Klein G, Moon et al. Making sense of sensemaking 1: alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2006; 21(4): 70-73. [DOI]
27. Bucklin BA, Asdigian NL, Hawkins JL, Klein U. Making it stick: use of active learning strategies in continuing medical education. BMC Medical Education. 2021; 21(1): 44. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.