Fri, Oct 18, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 17, Issue 55 (2024)
JMED 2024, 17(55): 138-153 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moradimokhles H, Pourjamshidi M, Mozafari O. Exploring the role of blockchain technology in medical education: Future opportunities and challenges. JMED 2024; 17 (55) :138-153
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1889-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1889-en.html
Bu-Ali Sina University
Abstract: (178 Views)
Background & Objective: Today, blockchain technology presents a new framework that can help address some challenges facing health and medical education. Accordingly, there is a growing interest in using this important technology, especially among medical educators. Looking towards the future of educational technology and considering the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, medical education experts are expected to accept blockchain technology widely. This study aims to investigate all aspects related to the application of blockchain in medical education.
Material & Methods: The study was conducted through a PRISMA systematic review of 10 databases, namely Scopus, Web of Science, Eric, Wiley Online Library, ProQuest, Springer, Noormags, Magiran, and Irandoc, in December 2022, and was updated in February 2023. By utilizing the strategies of this systematic review, a total of 980 related articles were identified, of which 187 were selected. After screening and criteria were applied, 18 relevant articles were selected to complete the research.
Results: The results show that the application of blockchain technology in medical education has the most significant impact in the two sectors of education and healthcare. In health and treatment, blockchain technology plays a crucial role in registering patients' treatment records, storing treatment information, and ensuring the security and durability of information. In medical education, blockchain technology is utilized to issue educational certificates, enhance credibility, offer cloud storage space, and enhance the quality of teaching and learning. The trend in research methods is shifting towards mixed methods.
Conclusion: According to this study, blockchain technology in medical education creates suitable capacities for learners and teachers through a systemic approach and collective wisdom. Despite the positive aspects and efforts to address the challenges, the field of medical education is still experiencing an exponential trend in the use of technology. We expect more research and the integration of blockchain technology in medical education in the short term.
Material & Methods: The study was conducted through a PRISMA systematic review of 10 databases, namely Scopus, Web of Science, Eric, Wiley Online Library, ProQuest, Springer, Noormags, Magiran, and Irandoc, in December 2022, and was updated in February 2023. By utilizing the strategies of this systematic review, a total of 980 related articles were identified, of which 187 were selected. After screening and criteria were applied, 18 relevant articles were selected to complete the research.
Results: The results show that the application of blockchain technology in medical education has the most significant impact in the two sectors of education and healthcare. In health and treatment, blockchain technology plays a crucial role in registering patients' treatment records, storing treatment information, and ensuring the security and durability of information. In medical education, blockchain technology is utilized to issue educational certificates, enhance credibility, offer cloud storage space, and enhance the quality of teaching and learning. The trend in research methods is shifting towards mixed methods.
Conclusion: According to this study, blockchain technology in medical education creates suitable capacities for learners and teachers through a systemic approach and collective wisdom. Despite the positive aspects and efforts to address the challenges, the field of medical education is still experiencing an exponential trend in the use of technology. We expect more research and the integration of blockchain technology in medical education in the short term.
Article Type : Review |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2023/03/16 | Accepted: 2024/04/2 | Published: 2024/09/10
Received: 2023/03/16 | Accepted: 2024/04/2 | Published: 2024/09/10
References
1. Whitehead C. Scientist or science‐stuffed? Discourses of science in North American medical education. Medical Education. 2013;47(1):26-32. [DOI]
2. Nousiainen MT, McQueen SA, Hall J, et al. Resident education in orthopaedic trauma: the future role of competency-based medical education. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2016;98(10):1320-5. [DOI]
3. Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355(13):1339-44. [DOI]
4. Swanwick T. Doctors, science and society. Medical Education. 2013;47(1):7-9. [DOI]
5. Peters A. Can blockchain disrupt health education, licensing, and credentialing. The Lancet Global Health Blog. 2017 Oct 31. [DOI]
6. Lowendahl JM, Thayer TL, Morgan G, Yanckello R, Resnick M, Revang M. Top 10 strategic technologies impacting higher education in 2016. Research Note G. 2016;294732:15. [DOI]
7. Carey P. Scenarios of future schooling and futures thinking from the perspectives of educational and schools' leaders perspectives. Authorea Preprints. 2024. [DOI]
8. McAliney PJ, Ang B. Blockchain: business’ next new “It” technology—a comparison of blockchain, relational databases, and Google Sheets. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. 2019;16(4):163-73. [DOI]
9. Funk E, Riddell J, Ankel F, Cabrera D. Blockchain technology: a data framework to improve validity, trust, and accountability of information exchange in health professions education. Academic Medicine. 2018 Dec 1;93(12):1791-4. [DOI]
10. ALSaqa ZH, Hussein AI, Mahmood SM. The impact of blockchain on accounting information systems. Journal of Information Technology Management. 2019;11(3):62-80. [DOI]
11. Zhao G, Liu S, Lopez C, et al.. Blockchain technology in agri-food value chain management: A synthesis of applications, challenges and future research directions. Computers in industry. 2019;109:83-99. [DOI]
12. Chen W, Xu Z, Shi S, Zhao Y, Zhao J. A survey of blockchain applications in different domains. InProceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Application 2018 Dec 10 (pp. 17-21). [DOI]
13. Brown-Liburd H, Cheong A, Vasarhelyi MA, Wang X. Measuring with Exogenous Data (MED), and government economic monitoring (GEM). Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. 2019;16(1):1-9. [DOI]
14. McCallig J, Robb A, Rohde F. Establishing the representational faithfulness of financial accounting information using multiparty security, network analysis and a blockchain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2019 Jun 1;33:47-58. [DOI]
15. Stein Smith S. Implications of next step blockchain applications for accounting and legal practitioners: a case study. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 2018;12(4):77-90. [DOI]
16. Sharples, M. Domingue, J., 2016. The blockchain and kudos: a distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward. In Adaptive and Adaptable Learning: 11th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2016, Lyon, France, September 13-16, 2016, Proceedings 11 (pp. 490-496). Springer International Publishing. [DOI]
17. Yang XM, Li X, Wu HQ, Zhao KY. The application model and challenges of blockchain technology in education. Modern Distance Education Research. 2017;2:34-45. [DOI]
18. Nugent T, Upton D, Cimpoesu M. Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts. F1000Research. 2016;5. [DOI]
19. Ten Cate O. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2013;5(1):157-8. [DOI]
20. Iobst WF, Sherbino J, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education. Medical Teacher. 2010;32(8):651-6. [DOI]
21. Mosalanezhad L, Atashpoor S, Kalani N. What do medical students want to learn in the Corona crisis curriculum? expressing students' expectations and strategies. Education and Ethics in Nursing. 2021;10(1-2):4-11. [DOI]
22. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991;45(3):214-22. [DOI]
23. Averis A, Pearson A. Filling the gaps: identifying nursing research priorities through the analysis of completed systematic reviews JBI Reports. 2003;1(3):49–126. [DOI]
24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2021;372. [DOI]
25. Knoke D, Yang S. Social network analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. 2008. [DOI]
26. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. 1990: pp. 169-186. [DOI]
27. Moher D, Booth A, Stewart L. How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(7):784-6. [DOI]
28. Tapscott D, Tapscott A. How blockchain will change organizations. 2018. [DOI]
29. Taghian A, Abo-Zahhad M, Sayed MS, Abd El-Malek AH. Virtual and augmented reality in biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2023;22(1):76. [DOI]
30. Snegireva D, Minbaleev A, Cherkasov N. Model for diploma authentication using blockchain technology. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2023 Dec 26 (Vol. 2624, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [DOI]
31. Mozumder MA, Athar A, Armand TP, Sheeraz MM, Uddin SM, Kim HC. Technological roadmap of the future trend of metaverse based on IoT, blockchain, and AI techniques in metaverse education. In2023 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) 2023 Feb 19 (pp. 1414-1423). IEEE. [DOI]
32. Tissier EA, Berglund A, Johnson GJ, et al. Time until proof of credentials significantly decreases with the use of blockchain technology and the document management system. Cureus. 2023;15(11). [DOI]
33. Haque MA, Haque S, Zeba S, et al. Sustainable and efficient e-learning internet of things system through blockchain technology. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2023:20427530231156711. [DOI]
34. Xie Y, Zhang J, Wang H, et al. Applications of blockchain in the medical field: narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021 Oct 28;23(10):e28613. [DOI]
35. Meredith ED, Fred RD, Forest RD. The quantitative strategic planning matrix: A new marketing tool. Journal of strategic marketing. 2017;25(4):342-52. [DOI]
36. Valentin EK. SWOT analysis from a resource-based view. Journal of marketing theory and practice. 2001 Apr 1;9(2):54-69. [DOI]
37. Niranjanamurthy M, Nithya B, Jagannatha S. Analysis of blockchain technology: pros, cons and SWOT. Cluster Computing. 2019;22:14743-57. [DOI]
38. Wu B, Li Y. Design of evaluation system for digital education operational skill competition based on blockchain. In2018 IEEE 15th international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE) 2018 Oct 12 (pp. 102-109). IEEE. [DOI]
39. Phadermrod B, Crowder RM, Wills GB. Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management. 2019;44:194-203. [DOI]
40. 40- Aldehayyat JS, Anchor JR. Strategic planning tools and techniques in Jordan: awareness and use. Strategic Change. 2008;17(7‐8):281-93. [DOI]
41. Radanović I, Likić R. Opportunities for use of blockchain technology in medicine. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2018;16:583-90. [DOI]
42. Mackey TK, Kuo TT, Gummadi B, et al. ‘Fit-for-purpose?’–challenges and opportunities for applications of blockchain technology in the future of healthcare. BMC Medicine. 2019;17:1-7. [DOI]
43. Funk E, Riddell J, Ankel F, Cabrera D. Blockchain technology: a data framework to improve validity, trust, and accountability of information exchange in health professions education. Academic Medicine. 2018;93(12):1791-4. [DOI]
44. Maslove DM, Klein J, Brohman K, Martin P. Using blockchain technology to manage clinical trials data: a proof-of-concept study. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2018;6(4):e11949. [DOI]
45. Maddikunta PK, Pham QV, Prabadevi B, et al. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022;26:100257. [DOI]
46. Beinke JH, Fitte C, Teuteberg F. Towards a stakeholder-oriented blockchain-based architecture for electronic health records: design science research study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(10):e13585. [DOI]
47. Dubovitskaya A, Baig F, Xu Z, et al. ACTION-EHR: Patient-centric blockchain-based electronic health record data management for cancer care. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(8):e13598. [DOI]
48. Zheng X, Sun S, Mukkamala RR, Vatrapu R, Ordieres-Meré J. Accelerating health data sharing: a solution based on the internet of things and distributed ledger technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(6):e13583. [DOI]
49. Wu B, Li Y. Design of evaluation system for digital education operational skill competition based on blockchain. In2018 IEEE 15th international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE) 2018 Oct 12 (pp. 102-109). IEEE. [DOI]
50. Rathod J, Gupta A, Patel D. Using blockchain technology for continuing medical education credits system. In2020 Seventh International Conference on Software Defined Systems (SDS) 2020 Apr 20 (pp. 214-219). IEEE. [DOI]
51. El-Gazzar R, Stendal K. Blockchain in health care: hope or hype? Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(7):e17199. [PubMed]
52. 52. De EJ, Faiçal BS, Krishnamachari B, Ueyama J. A survey of blockchain-based strategies for healthcare. ACM Computing Surveys. 2020;53(2):1-27. [DOI]
53. 53. Bartolomé AR. Blockchain in Educational Methodologies. Radical Solutions and eLearning: Practical Innovations and Online Educational Technology; 2020:63-79. [DOI]
54. 54. Ma Y, Fang Y. Current status, issues, and challenges of blockchain applications in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET). 2020;15(12):20-31. [DOI]
55. 55. Duy PT, Hien DT, Hien DH, Pham VH. A survey on opportunities and challenges of Blockchain technology adoption for revolutionary innovation. InProceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology 2018 Dec 6 (pp. 200-207). [DOI]
56. 56. Chang SE, Chen Y. Blockchain in health care innovation: literature review and case study from a business ecosystem perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(8):e19480. [DOI]
57. 57. Park YR, Lee E, Na W, Park S, Lee Y, Lee JH. Is blockchain technology suitable for managing personal health records? Mixed-methods study to test feasibility. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(2):e12533. [DOI]
58. 58. Durneva P, Cousins K, Chen M. The current state of research, challenges, and future research directions of blockchain technology in patient care: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(7):e18619. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
