Volume 16, Issue 50 (2023)                   JMED 2023, 16(50): 21-27 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Anil D, Kumar D S, Murthy M R N. Self-directed learning: The impact among medical students. JMED 2023; 16 (50) :21-27
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1792-en.html
1- Department of Community Medicine JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research. , deepakanil7@gmail.com
2- Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Sri Shivarathreeshwara Nagara, Mysuru- 570015, Karnataka, India.
3- Professor, Department of Community Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research
Abstract:   (2235 Views)
Background & objective: Self-directed learning (SDL) has grown popular in the medical curriculum and is recommended as an effective learning approach for medical students. As medical research is continuously changing and information is exploding, it is critical to prepare doctors for SDL. The present study aimed to assess the impact and perception of SDL among medical students.
Materials & methods: This longitudinal study was done among 131 first-year medical students for 2 months. A poster competition was conducted and the students were asked to give their feedback through an online Google form, one week after the competition. Descriptive statistics were applied and analyzed using SPSS software. The location of the participants was obtained, and the geographical data were analyzed in the Quantum Geographical Information System (QGIS).
Results: Among the 131 study participants, 61.8% were female. Almost 94.7% of participants informed SDL was a helpful learning approach and 97.7% informed it had helped them learn at their own pace. SDL exercises also helped the participants determine their level of readiness to learn (52.67%), set learning goals (56.48%), engage in the learning process (75.57%), and evaluate their learning (47.33%).
Conclusion: SDL was deemed beneficial by the majority of participants in terms of grasping the subject and studying at their own speed. Studies correlating the SDL perception and the student’s academic performance are lacking, which makes it difficult to predict their success in the upcoming exams. As a result, additional research is needed in this area.
Full-Text [PDF 406 kb]   (922 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (772 Views)  
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2022/11/28 | Accepted: 2023/02/20 | Published: 2023/05/17

References
1. Premkumar K, Vinod E, Sathishkumar S, Pulimood AB, Umaefulam V, Samuel PP, John TA. Self-directed learning readiness of Indian medical students: a mixed method study. BMC medical education. 2018;18(1):1-0. [DOI]
2. Hill M, Peters M, Salvaggio M, Vinnedge J, Darden A. Implementation and evaluation of a self-directed learning activity for first-year medical students. Medical education online. 2020 1;25(1):1717780. [DOI]
3. Soliman M, Al-Shaikh G. Readiness for self-directed learning among first year Saudi medical students: A descriptive study. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;31(4):799. [DOI]
4. Knowles MS. Innovations in teaching styles and approaches based upon adult learning. Journal of education for social work. 1972 1;8(2):32-9. [DOI]
5. Towle A, Cottrell D. Self directed learning. Archives of disease in childhood. 1996 Apr 1;74(4):357-9. [DOI]
6. Frambach JM, Driessen EW, Chan LC, van der Vleuten CP. Rethinking the globalisation of problem‐based learning: how culture challenges self‐directed learning. Medical education. 2012;46(8):738-47. [DOI]
7. Pai KM, Rao KR, Punja D, Kamath A. The effectiveness of self-directed learning (SDL) for teaching physiology to first-year medical students. The Australasian medical journal. 2014;7(11):448. [PubMed]
8. List of College Teaching MBBS | NMC [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 19]. Available from: [Article]
9. Kar SS, Premarajan KC, Ramalingam A, Iswarya S, Sujiv A, Subitha L. Self-directed learning readiness among fifth semester MBBS students in a teaching institution of South India. Education for Health. 2014;27(3):289. [DOI]
10. Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara University [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 2]. Available from: [Article]
11. Keator CS, Vandre DD, Morris AM. The challenges of developing a project-based self-directed learning component for undergraduate medical education. Medical Science Educator. 2016;26(4):801-5. [DOI]
12. Gon S, Rawekar A. Effectivity of e-learning through WhatsApp as a teaching learning tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;4(1):19-25. [DOI]
13. Holmboe ES, Prince L, Green M. Teaching and improving quality of care in a primary care internal medicine residency clinic. Academic Medicine. 2005;80(6):571-7. [DOI]
14. Anderson SM, Helberg SB. Chart-based, case-based learning. South Dakota medicine: the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association. 2007;60(10):391-3. [PubMed]
15. Shokar GS, Shokar NK, Romero CM, Bulik RJ. Self-directed learning: looking at outcomes with medical students. Family Medicine-Kansas City-. 2002;34(3):197-200. [PubMed]
16. Williams B. Self direction in a problem based learning program. Nurse Education Today. 2004;24(4):277-85. [DOI]
17. Sahoo S. Finding self-directed learning readiness and fostering self-directed learning through weekly assessment of self-directed learning topics during undergraduate clinical training in ophthalmology. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research. 2016;6(3):166. [DOI]
18. Greveson GC, Spencer JA. Self-directed learning – The importance of concepts and contexts. Medical Education. 2005;39:348–9. [DOI]
19. McCune SK. Texas A & M University; 1988. A meta-analytic study of adult self-direction in learning: A review of the research from 1977 to 1987 [Dissertation]
20. Devi S, Bhat KS, Ramya SR, Ravichandran K, Kanungo R. Self-directed learning to enhance active learning among the 2nd-year undergraduate medical students in Microbiology: An experimental study. Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine. 2016;2(2):80. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.