Sat, May 31, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 16, Issue 49 (2023)
JMED 2023, 16(49): 30-35 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: ECR/717/INST/UP/2015/RR-21
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nigam B, Singh L, Gupta S. Teachers' perception in medical university towards online assessment of students conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. JMED 2023; 16 (49) :30-35
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1765-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1765-en.html
1- ERAs lucknow medical college and hospital,lucknow,uttar pradesh,india , sona17.agra@gmail.com
2- ERAs lucknow medical college and hospital,lucknow,uttar pradesh,india
2- ERAs lucknow medical college and hospital,lucknow,uttar pradesh,india
Abstract: (1989 Views)
Background & Objective: During this COVID-19 pandemic a large number of institutes have undertaken an online assessment of medical students such as zoom meets, online objective structured clinical examination [OSCE] google forms, etc. The present study was undertaken to determine the perceptions and opinions of teachers towards online assessment so as to plan the future strategy regarding the assessment system.
Materials & Methods: An online questionnaire was validated and distributed among 120 teaching faculty of a tertiary care hospital in North India and informed consent was obtained. It consisted of standard Likert scale questions which comprised 22 questions. The questionnaire was grouped into 4 categories: demographics, Comparison between traditional and online assessment, Advantages and limitations, different teaching methods, and acceptance of online assessment. The responses were collected and analyzed by using descriptive analyses.
Result: The mean age was 41.25 ± 9.35 out of which the majority were females (55%). Most teachers found online exams less stressful, within the COVID norms, and more comfortable. The main limitation was no interaction between the patients & students followed by poor internet connection. 70.30% of the teaching faculty prefers traditional face-to-face assessment to online assessment, 23.40% select the blended mode, and only 6.30% of teachers prefer online assessment.
Conclusion: The results from our study depicted that 70% of the teaching faculty prefer traditional assessment. The responses provided us with the viewpoint of the medical institute's teaching faculty, which will help us improve the logistic of the assessment program.
Materials & Methods: An online questionnaire was validated and distributed among 120 teaching faculty of a tertiary care hospital in North India and informed consent was obtained. It consisted of standard Likert scale questions which comprised 22 questions. The questionnaire was grouped into 4 categories: demographics, Comparison between traditional and online assessment, Advantages and limitations, different teaching methods, and acceptance of online assessment. The responses were collected and analyzed by using descriptive analyses.
Result: The mean age was 41.25 ± 9.35 out of which the majority were females (55%). Most teachers found online exams less stressful, within the COVID norms, and more comfortable. The main limitation was no interaction between the patients & students followed by poor internet connection. 70.30% of the teaching faculty prefers traditional face-to-face assessment to online assessment, 23.40% select the blended mode, and only 6.30% of teachers prefer online assessment.
Conclusion: The results from our study depicted that 70% of the teaching faculty prefer traditional assessment. The responses provided us with the viewpoint of the medical institute's teaching faculty, which will help us improve the logistic of the assessment program.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2022/11/7 | Accepted: 2023/01/23 | Published: 2023/03/27
Received: 2022/11/7 | Accepted: 2023/01/23 | Published: 2023/03/27
References
1. Nelson, Robert; Dawson, Phillip (2014). "A contribution to the history of assessment: how a conversation simulator redeems Socratic method". Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39 (2): 195–204. [DOI]
2. Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 2006 ;31(2): 2-19. [DOI]
3. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. New England journal of medicine. 2007;356(4):387–96. [Article]
4. Sahu PK, Chattu VK, Rewatkar A, Sakhamuri S. Best practices to impart clinical skills during preclinical years of medical curriculum. Journal of Education Health Promotion 2019;14;8:57. [DOI]
5. Dhawan S. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of EducationalTechnologySystems.2020;49(1):5–22. [DOI]
6. Fatima SS, Idrees R, Jabeen K, Sabzwari S, Khan S. Online assessment in undergraduate medical education: Challenges and solutions from a LMIC university. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):945-951. [DOI]
7. E. Howe. Perceptions of E-Assessment by Students And Lecturers. International Journal Of Education And Research.2020 april;8(4)143-152.
8. Appana, S. A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E‐learning.2008; 7(1), 5–22. [Article]
9. Bączek, M. , Zagańczyk‐Bączek, M. , Szpringer, M. , Jaroszyński, A. , & Wożakowska‐Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100(7), e24821. [DOI]
10. Barbour, M. K.. The landscape of k‐12 online learning: Examining what is known. Handbook of Distance Education, 2013;3, 574–593.
11. Basuony, M.A.K., EmadEldeen, R., Farghaly, M., El-Bassiouny, N. and Mohamed, E.K.A. The factors affecting student satisfaction with online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study of an emerging Muslim country", Journal of Islamic Marketing.2021;12(3):631-648. [DOI]
12. Harvey, D. , Greer, D. , Basham, J. , & Hu, B. From the student perspective: Experiences of middle and high school students in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education.2014;28(1): 14–26. [DOI]
13. Nimavat N, Singh S, Fichadiya N, Sharma P, Patel N, Kumar M, Chauhan G, Pandit N. Online Medical Education in India - Different Challenges and Probable Solutions in the Age of COVID-19. Advances in Medical Education And Practice. 2021 . 4;12:237-243. [DOI]
14. Mirza, H. S. University Teachers’ Perceptions of Online Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lebanon. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal.2021;13(1):11-24.
15. Muilenburg, L. Y. , & Berge, Z. L. Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education.2007; 26(1): 29–48. [DOI]
16. Niemi, H. M. , & Kousa, P. A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a finnish high school during the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science.2020;4(4): 352–369. [DOI]
17. Meccawy, Z., Meccawy, M. & Alsobhi, A. Assessment in ‘survival mode’: student and faculty perceptions of online assessment practices in HE during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 2021;17, 16. [DOI]
18. Kayed, H., Al-Madadha, A., and Abualbasal, A. (2022). The effect of entrepreneurial education and culture on entrepreneurial intention. Organizacija. 55, 18–34. doi: 10.2478/orga-2022-0002Harvey, D. , Greer, D. , Basham, J. , & Hu, B. From the student perspective: Experiences of middle and high school students in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education.2014;28(1): 14–26. [DOI]
19. Küppers, B., & Schroeder, U. Teacher’s perspective on e-assessment: A case study from Germany. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. 2020.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
