Fri, Nov 22, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 17, Issue 53 (2024)
JMED 2024, 17(53): 91-100 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Navab E, Hoseini Azizi T, Darvish A. Comparative study of master's degree curricula in nursing informatics at Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the University of Maryland. JMED 2024; 17 (53) :91-100
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1685-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1685-en.html
Lecturer, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Khorasan, Iran.
Abstract: (1064 Views)
Background & Objective: As the healthcare landscape undergoes transformation and information technology and digital health continue to advance, the significance of nursing informatics has come to the forefront. This has emphasized the need to enhance the quality of the curriculum, required competencies, and to draw comparisons with successful programs globally. The study aimed to compare the master's curriculum in nursing informatics at Tehran University of Medical Sciences with that of the University of Maryland.
Materials & Methods: Conducted in 2022, this comparative study utilized the Bereday model across four stages: description, interpretation, juxtaposition, comparison. The University of Maryland was selected for comparison due to its global reputation as a leading institution in nursing informatics. The study encompassed an examination of the overall structure, curriculum, mission, professional roles, and admission conditions.
Results: The curricula of both universities exhibited substantial similarities in more than half of the cases. Consistencies were observed in mission-vision statements and student acceptance criteria. However, variations between the two institutions emerged in terms of class types, details regarding the number of courses, and the definition of professional roles.
Conclusion: Recognizing the critical role of nursing informatics training, suggested reforms to enhance professional roles, course content, and planning for flexibility, including diverse teaching methods both in non-attendance (e-learning) and face-to-face formats, can contribute to the enhancement of the curriculum in Tehran. Given the extensive history of this specialized field globally, there is a pressing need to enhance university education in nursing schools in Iran. It is recommended that, in addition to the master's degree in Iran, the program development in the form of short-term courses should be considered—either one year or fellowships—tailored to current needs.
Materials & Methods: Conducted in 2022, this comparative study utilized the Bereday model across four stages: description, interpretation, juxtaposition, comparison. The University of Maryland was selected for comparison due to its global reputation as a leading institution in nursing informatics. The study encompassed an examination of the overall structure, curriculum, mission, professional roles, and admission conditions.
Results: The curricula of both universities exhibited substantial similarities in more than half of the cases. Consistencies were observed in mission-vision statements and student acceptance criteria. However, variations between the two institutions emerged in terms of class types, details regarding the number of courses, and the definition of professional roles.
Conclusion: Recognizing the critical role of nursing informatics training, suggested reforms to enhance professional roles, course content, and planning for flexibility, including diverse teaching methods both in non-attendance (e-learning) and face-to-face formats, can contribute to the enhancement of the curriculum in Tehran. Given the extensive history of this specialized field globally, there is a pressing need to enhance university education in nursing schools in Iran. It is recommended that, in addition to the master's degree in Iran, the program development in the form of short-term courses should be considered—either one year or fellowships—tailored to current needs.
Article Type : Review |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2022/08/24 | Accepted: 2023/12/8 | Published: 2024/04/16
Received: 2022/08/24 | Accepted: 2023/12/8 | Published: 2024/04/16
References
1. Wilson ML, Elias, BL, Moss JA. Education in nursing informatics. In: Berner, E.S. (eds) Informatics education in healthcare. Health informatics. Springer: Cham; 2020. 23-43. [DOI]
2. Darvish A, Bahramnezhad F, Keyhanian S, Navidhamidi M. The role of nursing informatics on promoting quality of health care and the need for appropriate education. Global Journal of Health Science. 2014;6(6):11-18. [DOI]
3. Peltonen LM, Nibber R, Lewis A, Block L, Pruinelli L, Topaz M, Lozada Perezmitre E, Ronquillo C. Emerging professionals' observations of opportunities and challenges in nursing informatics. Nursing Leadership (1910-622X). 2019;1;32(2). 8-18. [DOI]
4. American Nurses Association, American Nurses Association. Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association; 2015.
5. McNeil BJ, Odom SK. Nursing informatics education in the United States: proposed undergraduate curriculum. Health Informatics Journal. 2000;6(1):32-8. [DOI]
6. American Nurses Association. Nursing Informatics Scope and Standards of Practice, 3rd Edition. Edition T, editor: American Nurses Association, Nursing Knowledge Center; 2021. Nov. 2022. [Online].Available from: [Article]
7. Khezri H, Abdekhoda M. Assessing nurses’ informatics competency and identifying its related factors. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2019;24(7):529-38.. [DOI]
8. Elahi N, Afra A, Langarizadeh M, Beirami Pour A. Designing master curriculum of nursing informatics in Iran. Journal of Nursing Education. 2018;10;7(6):14-23. [DOI]
9. Cummins MR, Sward K, Guo JW. Leaders in nursing informatics education and research: The University of Utah Celebrates 25 Years. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2015;1;33(9):379-81. [DOI]
10. Farsi Z, Nasiri M, Sajadi SA, Khavasi M. Comparison of Iran’s nursing education with developed and developing countries: a review on descriptive-comparative studies. Bmc Nursing. 2022;21(1):1-9. [DOI]
11. Darvish A, Tabibi SJ, Alborzi M, Radfar R. Investigation and comparison of nursing informatics development factors in iran and selected countries: A comparative study. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2021;10;15(6):10-28.
12. . Peltonen LM, Pruinelli L, Ronquillo C, Nibber R, Peresmitre EL, Block L, Deforest H, Lewis A, Alhuwail D, Ali S, Badger MK. The current state of Nursing Informatics–An international cross-sectional survey. Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare. 2019;6;11(3):220-31. [DOI]
13. Nursing Informatics Tehran: School of Nursing and Midwifery; 2022. [Online]. Available from: http://en.tums.ac.ir/en/department/major/431/nursing-informatics-on-campus- [Accessed: Dec. 7, 2023].
14. School of Nursing and Midwifery Committee, TUMS. Curriculum of Master of Science in Nursing Informatics (MSc) in English. [Curriculum]. Tehran, Iran.: Tehran university of medical sciences; 2015. [Online]. Available from: [Article]
15. Adib-Hajbaghery M. Comparative Study of Nursing Phd Education System and Curriculum in Iran and Yale of USA. Medical Education Journal. 2020;15;8(1):7-14.
16. Ebrahimi S, Borzuo SR, Tehrani TH. A comparative study of the master's curricula of psychiatric nursing of Vanderbilt University, USA and Iran. Journal of Nursing Education (JNE). 2023;12(1):49-60. [DOI]
17. Baghaei R, Mokhtari L, Mihandoost S, Hosseinzadegan F. Comparative study of nursing education in three Middle East countries. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2021; 13(40):30-40. [DOI]
18. University of Maryland School of Nursing. Since 1889, UMSON has shaped the profession of nursing and the health care environment by developing leaders in education, research, and practice. [Online]. Available from: [Article]
19. University of Maryland—Baltimore. University of Maryland--Baltimore 2021 Rankings 2020 [Online]. Available from: [Article]
20. Alves Madureira MD, Brandao CD, Laham D, Aparecida S. Historical overview of comparative education: george bereday's contributions. Revista On Line De Politica E Gestao Educacional. 2021;1:1881-97. [DOI]
21. Phillips D, Schweisfurth M. Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method, and practice. A&C Black; 2014;13.
22. Adick C. Bereday and Hilker: origins of the ‘four steps of comparison’model. Comparative Education. 2018;2;54(1):35-48. [DOI]
23. University of Maryland School of Nursing. Online MSN: Nursing Informatics. [Online] Available from: [Article]
24. Maryland. Nursing Informatics, Information for Prospective Students 2020-2022. [Online]. Available from: [Article]
25. Maryland. Nursing Informatics, Student Welcome Packet 2022. [Online]. Available from: [Article]
26. American Nurses Credentialing Center. Informatics Nursing Certification (NI-BC): American Nurses Association. [Online]. Available from: [Article]
27. Master's educational regulations Tehran, Iran.: Ministry of health and medical education; [Online]. Available from: [Article]
28. Yaghmaei F, Tabar RA, Varzeshnejad N. NICU Nurses satisfaction about participate in ICDL course. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care. 2010;10;18(2):11-21.
29. Forman TM, Armor DA, Miller AS. A review of clinical informatics competencies in nursing to inform best practices in education and nurse faculty development. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2020;1;41(1):E3-7. [DOI]
30. Rezaie F, Sanagoo A, Araghian Mojarad F, Jouybari L. Comparative study of master’s critical care nursing program in Iran and Scotland (University of Edinburgh). Research in Medical Education. 2022;10;14(2):58-66. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
