Sun, Jun 8, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 15, Issue 47 (2022)
JMED 2022, 15(47): 27-35 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.ZUMS.REC.1399.393
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mousavi S K, Kamali M. Clinical self-efficacy of final-year nursing students: A comparison of a 360-degree evaluation method with a conventional method. JMED 2022; 15 (47) :27-35
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1662-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1662-en.html
1- Zanjan University of Medical Sciences , kazemmoosavi69@gmail.com
2- Zanjan University of Medical Sciences
2- Zanjan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (2412 Views)
Background & Objective: The use of traditional clinical evaluation methods is one of the most critical challenges in obtaining professional competence and self-efficacy in clinical performance. This study aims to investigate the clinical self-efficacy of final-year nursing students by comparing a 360-degree evaluation method with a conventional evaluation method.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 65 final-year nursing students at Abhar School of Nursing who were selected by census method and randomly divided into two control and experimental groups. In the beginning, the participants completed the clinical self-efficacy questionnaire then a briefing session was held for the experimental group. In the next step, a clinical evaluation of the experimental group was performed using the 360-degree standard form for two weeks. Furthermore, a routine evaluation method was used for the control group. At the end of the internship, both groups completed the clinical self-efficacy questionnaire again. Data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 25) using ANOVA, paired, and independent t-tests.
Results: It was shown that the total self-efficacy score of the students in the experimental group increased after implementing the 360-degree method (P=0.003). Moreover, the clinical self-efficacy scores in the control and experimental groups revealed that the scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P=0.024).
Conclusion: According to these findings, the use of the 360-degree evaluation method positively promotes students' clinical performance self-efficacy. Therefore, it is suggested that educational managers consider this evaluation method more and more as a comprehensive, appropriate, and efficient method for clinical courses.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 65 final-year nursing students at Abhar School of Nursing who were selected by census method and randomly divided into two control and experimental groups. In the beginning, the participants completed the clinical self-efficacy questionnaire then a briefing session was held for the experimental group. In the next step, a clinical evaluation of the experimental group was performed using the 360-degree standard form for two weeks. Furthermore, a routine evaluation method was used for the control group. At the end of the internship, both groups completed the clinical self-efficacy questionnaire again. Data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 25) using ANOVA, paired, and independent t-tests.
Results: It was shown that the total self-efficacy score of the students in the experimental group increased after implementing the 360-degree method (P=0.003). Moreover, the clinical self-efficacy scores in the control and experimental groups revealed that the scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P=0.024).
Conclusion: According to these findings, the use of the 360-degree evaluation method positively promotes students' clinical performance self-efficacy. Therefore, it is suggested that educational managers consider this evaluation method more and more as a comprehensive, appropriate, and efficient method for clinical courses.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Education
Received: 2022/07/28 | Accepted: 2022/12/6 | Published: 2022/12/19
Received: 2022/07/28 | Accepted: 2022/12/6 | Published: 2022/12/19
References
1. Ghorbani S, Heshmati Nabavi F, Heidarian Miri H, Mazlom S R, Akbari Rad S A, Mohebbi T. Evaluation of clinical competence of novice nurses from the perspective of head nurses, a cross-sectional descriptive study in mashhad university of medical sciences in 2019. Quarterly Journal of Nursing Management. 2021;10:60-67. [Article]
2. Lynne P L, Van Horn, ER. The state of the science on clinical evaluation in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2019;40:4-10. [DOI]
3. Seyedamini B, Nouri M, Mahmoudifar Y, Esmaillo Y. Concepts in evaluating effective clinical education: a qualitative study of nursing students’ experiences. Health Technology Assessment in Action. 2021:5:1-7. [DOI]
4. Farzi S, Shahriari M, Farzi S. Exploring the challenges of clinical education in nursing and strategies to improve it: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2018;7:1-8. [DOI]
5. Günaydin N, Coban SA. Experiences of nursing students during clinical education in mental health clinics: A phenomenological qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2021;54:1-7. [DOI]
6. Gamtessa LCh. Correlation between academic and clinical practice performance of nursing students at a pediatrics and child health nursing course; Mizan-tepi university, Ethiopia. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2021;12:155-162. [DOI]
7. Georgea TP, DeCristofaro C, Murphy PF. Self-efficacy and concerns of nursing students regarding clinical experiences. Nurse Education Today. 2020;90:1-6. [DOI]
8. Samadi N, Varei Sh, Ghiyasvandian Sh, Moshfeghi Sh. Evaluation the on feedback degree-360 on the evaluation of the clinical skills of the nursing students of Ardabil university medical of sciences. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Mid-wifery. 2019;7:250-257. [Article]
9. Shorey S, Lopez V. Self-Efficacy in a nursing context. Health promotion in health care – vital theories and research. Springer Cham. 2021;1:145-158. [DOI]
10. Brennan BA. The impact of self-efficacy based prebriefing on nursing student clinical competency and self-efficacy in simulation: An experimental study. Nurse Education Today. 2022;109:1-8. [DOI]
11. Akgül-Gündoğdu N, Selçuk-Tosun A. Examining the relationship between solution-focused thinking skills and self-efficacy levels of nursing students in Turkey. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2021;37:1180-1186. [DOI]
12. Øvrebø LJ, Dyrstad DN, Hansen BS. Assessment methods and tools to evaluate postgraduate critical care nursing students' competence in clinical placement. An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice. 2022;58:1-14. [DOI]
13. Rørtveit K, Hansen BS, Joa I, Lode K, Severinsson E. Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions- A review of the literature. Nursing Open. 2020;7:1285-1298. [DOI]
14. Lewallen LP, Van Horn ER. The state of the science on clinical evaluation in nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;40:4-10. [DOI]
15. Leighton K, Kardong-Edgren S, Gilbert GE. Are traditional and simulated clinical environments meeting nursing students’ learning needs?. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;59:85-93. [DOI]
16. Sadeghi T and Loripoor M. Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 2016;28:195–200. [DOI]
17. Georgieva D, Koleva G, Hristova I. Virtual Technologies in the Medical Professions - Creation of 360 - Degree Environments for Health Care Training. Technology, Education, Management Journal. 2021;10:1314-18. [DOI]
18. Yang TY, Huang Ch-H, An C, Weng Li-Ch. Construction and evaluation of a 360 degrees panoramic video on the physical examination of nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice. 2022;63:1-10. [DOI]
19. Baradaran H R, Kheirkhah M, Keykhosravi F. Using a 360degree feedback system for Performance Appraisal of Midwifery Students in Shahid Akbar Abadi Maternity hospital. Development Strategies in Medical Education. 2016;3:73-80. [Article]
20. Carlos VC, Salvador MG, Abraham EM, Erick CME, Corby MMR. 360-Degree evaluation review applied in top-level education. EUREKA: Social and Humanities. 2020;3:27-35. [DOI]
21. Awdishu L, Zheng A, Gerd Granas A, Galasso J, Macauley K, Butera C, Hutchins S, Wallace P, Garman K, Namba J. 360-Degree feedback model to enhance interprofessional learning. MedEdPublish. 2018;7:1-13. [DOI]
22. Sahebazamani M, Farahani H, Mehrbani E, Shahbazi M. Validity and reliability of 360-degree clinical evaluation in students' clinical evaluation nursing. Journal of Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences 2016;26:264-270. [Article]
23. Cheraghi F, Hasani F, Alavimajd H. Developing and psychometric evaluation of clinical performance self-efficacy instrument for nursing students. Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research. 2009;9:51-60. [DOI]
24. Cheraghi F, Hasani P, Riazi H. Correlation of self-efficacy with clinical performance of nursing students. Hamedan Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care. 2011;19:35-40. [Article]
25. Salimi HR, Pourebrahimi M, Hoseinabadi-Farahani MJ. Clinical self-efficacy, dimensions and related factors among nursing students. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing (IJPN). 2017;5:1-7. [DOI]
26. Soleimani F, Aghal M, Partash N, Aliagha Sarighamish A, Maghsoodi E. The effect of mindfulness-based education on nursing students’ clinical self-efficacy. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2021:9:823-831.
27. Bahador R S, Soltani F, Madadizadeh F. The assessment of relationship between creativity and self-efficacy of clinical performance based on the nursing process in nursing students of Kerman. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2016;5:12-22.
28. Pourteimour S, Jamshidi H, Parizad N. Clinical belongingness and its relationship with clinical self-efficacy among nursing students: a descriptive correlational study. Nursing and Midwifery Studies. 2021;10:47-51. [DOI]
29. Albagawi B, Mahmoud Hussein F, Alotaibi JS, Albougami AS, Amer MF, Alsharari AF, Assiri ZA, Alramadhan SE. Self-efficacy and clinical competence of fourth-year nursing students: A self-reported study. International journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 2019;6:65-70. [DOI]
30. Motahari M, Rahimibashar M, Ghasemnegad S. The relationship between clinical self-efficacy and academic achievement motivation in nursing students. Research in Medical Education. 2020;12:10-20. [DOI]
31. Zhang Z J. Zhang C L, Zhang X G, Liu X M, Zhung S, Wang J. Relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and achievement motivation in student nurses. Chinese Nursing Research. 2016;2:67-70. [DOI]
32. Kassem AH. Bullying behaviors and self efficacy among nursing students at clinical settings: Comparative study. Journal of Education and Practice 2015;6:25-36. [Article]
33. Cormack Cormack CL, Jensen E, Durham CO, Smith G, Dumas B. The 360-degree evaluation model: A method for assessing competency in graduate nursing students. A pilot research study. Nurse Education Today. 2018;64:132-137. [DOI]
34. Mousavi S , Sabzevari S, Safizadeh H. A comparison of common and 360-degree evaluation methods in terms of clinical skills of surgical technology students in Kerman university of medical sciences, Iran, in 2013. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2015;12:237-248. [Article]
35. González-Gil MT, Parro-Moreno AI, Oter-Quintana C, González-Blázquez C, Martínez-Marcos M, et al. 360-Degree evaluation: Towards a comprehensive, integrated assessment of performance on clinical placement in nursing degrees: A descriptive observational study. Nurse Education Today. 2020;95:1-9. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
