Mon, Jun 30, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 15, Issue 47 (2022)
JMED 2022, 15(47): 11-18 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1398.052
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Keshmiri F, Hoseinpoor A, Jambarsang S, Jabinian F, Shiryazdi M. Assessment of interprofessional professionalism of surgical residents and workers in operating units in teaching hospitals: A cross-sectional study. JMED 2022; 15 (47) :11-18
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1610-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1610-en.html
1- Shahid sadoughi University of Medical sceinces
2- Qom University of Medical Sciences ,ahoseinpoor91@gmail.com
2- Qom University of Medical Sciences ,
Abstract: (2256 Views)
Background & Objective: Professionalism and interprofessional cooperation are essential capabilities of health team members. Educational systems must use an appropriate approach for training and evaluating these capabilities. The present study aimed to investigate the adherence of surgical residents and personnel to interprofessional professionalism behavior in the operating units using the interprofessional professionalism Assessment (IPA).
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences from 2019 to 2020. The performance of surgical team members, including 113 residents, surgical technologists (operating room), and anesthesia technicians, was evaluated using the interprofessional professionalism assessment tool (IPA). Data were analyzed using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and analytical (ANOVA, Chi-square) tests.
Results: The score of interprofessional professionalism behavior of the team members in the operating units were reported as 1.16 ± 0.27 out of 5. No significant difference (F=0.24, P=0.333) was observed between the participants' scores in different disciplines. The lowest scores of the participants in the "excellent" range were 1.04±0.31 out of 5.
Conclusion: The results showed that interprofessional professionalism behavior among the participants was weak. It is suggested that planning for formal curriculum and continuous evaluation of adherence to improve the interprofessional behavior among surgical team members.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences from 2019 to 2020. The performance of surgical team members, including 113 residents, surgical technologists (operating room), and anesthesia technicians, was evaluated using the interprofessional professionalism assessment tool (IPA). Data were analyzed using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and analytical (ANOVA, Chi-square) tests.
Results: The score of interprofessional professionalism behavior of the team members in the operating units were reported as 1.16 ± 0.27 out of 5. No significant difference (F=0.24, P=0.333) was observed between the participants' scores in different disciplines. The lowest scores of the participants in the "excellent" range were 1.04±0.31 out of 5.
Conclusion: The results showed that interprofessional professionalism behavior among the participants was weak. It is suggested that planning for formal curriculum and continuous evaluation of adherence to improve the interprofessional behavior among surgical team members.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Received: 2022/05/21 | Accepted: 2022/10/18 | Published: 2022/10/18
Received: 2022/05/21 | Accepted: 2022/10/18 | Published: 2022/10/18
References
1. Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, Birch I, Boet S, Davies N, et al. A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Medical Teacher. 2016; 38(7):656-68. [PubMed]
2. Keshmiri F, Barghoun R, Broom and M, Zhaleh A, Nazmiah H. Reviewing on Interprofessional Collaboration Competencies in health care team. Medical Education. 2021;12(3):86-96. [DOI]
3. Collaborative Interprofessional Education. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, DC. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. 2016. Accessed 29 June 2018. [Article]
4. Frost JS, Hammer DP, Nunez LM, Adams JL, Chesluk B, Grus C, et al. The intersection of professionalism and interprofessional care: development and initial testing of the interprofessional professionalism assessment (IPA). Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2019;33(1):102-15. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Ahmady S, Mafinejad MK. Another look at what teachers and students think about interprofessional learning as a shared experience in Iran: a qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10): e020015. [DOI]
6. Ahmady S, Mirmoghtadaie Z, Rasouli D. Challenges to the Implementation of Interprofessional Education in Health Profession Education in Iran. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2020; 11:227-37. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Moaddab F, Javadi N, Ghanbari A, Taheri-Ezbarami Z, Pouralizade M. Status, Challenges and Strategies of Professional and Interprofessional Communication in Iranian Nursing: A Review Study. Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty. 2021;6(3):48-57. [Article]
8. Bazrafkan L, Najafi Kalyani M. Nursing students' experiences of clinical education: A qualitative study. Investigacion Y Educacion en Enfermeria. 2018;36(3). [DOI] [PubMed]
9. Beigzadeh A, Yamani N, Bahaadinbeigy K, Adibi P. Challenges and problems of clinical medical education in Iran: a systematic review of the literature. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2020;16(1). [DOI]
10. Zijlstra‐Shaw S, Robinson P, Roberts T. Assessing professionalism within dental education; the need for a definition. European Journal of Dental Education. 2012;16(1): e128-e36. [DOI]
11. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(4):435-41. [DOI] [PubMed]
12. Humphrey-Murto S, Carpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz L-A, Mascioli K, et al. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Academic Medicine. 2017;92(10):1491-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Oates M, Davidson M. A critical appraisal of instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education. Medical Education 2015; 49:386-98. [DOI]
14. Lawsche C. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75. [DOI]
15. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health. 2006;29(5):489-97. [DOI]
16. Mehdipour Rabori R, Dehghan M, Nematollahi M. Nursing students’ ethical challenges in the clinical settings: a mixed-methods study. Nursing Ethics. 2019;26(7-8):1983-91. [DOI]
17. Valizadeh L, Zamanzadeh V, Irajpour A, Shahani M. “Discrimination”, the Main Concern of Iranian Nurses over Inter-Professional Collaboration: An Explorative Qualitative Study Journal of Caring Sciences. 2015;4(2):115-23. [DOI] [PubMed]
18. Vafadar Z. The Necessity of Approach Change from Uni-Professional Education to Inter-Professional Education in Health Sciences. Journal of Medical Education. 2020;19(2): e107290. [DOI]
19. Vafadar Z, Vanaki Z, Ebadi A. Barriers to Implementation of Team Care and Interprofessional Education: The Viewpoints of Educational Managers of Iranian Health System. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2015;14(11): 936-49. [Article]
20. Sprung CL, Cohen R, Marini JJ. Excellence in intensive care medicine. Critical Care Medicine. 2016;44(1):202-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
21. Kaslow NJ, Farber EW, Ammons CJ, Graves CC, Hampton-Anderson JN, Lewis DE, et al. Capability-informed competency approach to lifelong professional development. Training and Education in Professional Psychology. 2022;16(2):182. [DOI]
22. Links MJ. Beyond competency-based continuing professional development. Medical Teacher. 2018;40(3):253-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
23. Tsou P, Shih J, Ho M-J. A comparative study of professional and interprofessional values between health professional associations. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2015;29(6):628-33. [DOI] [PubMed]
24. Axelsson SB, Axelsson R. From territoriality to altruism in interprofessional collaboration and leadership. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2009;23(4):320-30. [DOI]
25. Keshmiri F. Relationship between Self-efficacy and Attitudes towards Interprofessional collaboration and Communication in Learners of Different disciplines of Medical Sciences. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2021;18(1). [DOI]
26. Tørring B, Gittell JH, Laursen M, Rasmussen BS, Sørensen EE. Communication and relationship dynamics in surgical teams in the operating room: an ethnographic study. BMC Health Services Research. 2019;19(1):528. [DOI]
27. Heshmati H. Effective factors in clinical education quality from the viewpoints of operation room and anesthesiology students in Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2015; 15:601-12. [Article]
28. Shokri A, Yazdan Panah A, Vahdat S. The professional relationship between the nurses and physicians from their own point of view. Journal of Health and Care. 2013;15(1):76-69. [Article]
29. Jayasuriya-Illesinghe V, Guruge S, Gamage B, Espin S. Interprofessional work in operating rooms: a qualitative study from Sri Lanka. BMC Surgery. 2016;16(1):61. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
