Volume 18, Issue 1 (2025)                   JMED 2025, 18(1): 54-64 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: 972424


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidari A, Yoosefee S, Adeli S, AhmariTehran H, Ardebili M, Heidari M. Facilitators and barriers of the integration of spirituality into medical education: A situation analysis. JMED 2025; 18 (1) :54-64
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2266-en.html
1- Spiritual Health Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
2- Spiritual Health Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. Neuroscience Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
3- School of Health and Religion, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. Spiritual Health Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran , mortezaheidari.mh@gmail.com
Abstract:   (241 Views)
Background & Objective: Spirituality is regarded as an essential aspect of health, and therefore, it should be incorporated into medical education to foster a holistic understanding of health and to develop fully competent medical professionals. Despite the significance of incorporating spiritual issues into medical education, there has been limited research conducted on this topic in Iran. Various barriers have hindered the implementation of spiritually enriched medical education; however, there are also some factors that facilitate this process. This study attempted to explore the facilitators and barriers of integrating spirituality in medical education through a qualitative content analysis.
Materials & Methods: This was a situation analysis designed and conducted as a directed content analysis study. The data collected from interviews with medical education experts and the review of upstream documents were analyzed, revealing findings categorized as internal and external factors. Internal factors were categorized using the McKinsey 7S framework, which includes structure, systems, strategies, skills, staff, style, and shared values. Meanwhile, external factors were classified according to the PEST model, encompassing political, economic, socio-cultural, and technological aspects.
Results: The facilitators and barriers identified in this study encompassed a total of 100 concepts. We identified 27 internal and 16 external facilitators, while there were found 41 internal and 16 external barriers.
Conclusion: The findings of this study clarify the steps needed to uphold the goals and missions of medical education in the area of spiritual health. Overcoming the barriers while leveraging existing facilitators will be crucial for successfully incorporating spiritual health into Iranian medical education.

 
Full-Text [PDF 808 kb]   (19 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (6 Views)  
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2024/09/1 | Accepted: 2025/02/5 | Published: 2025/04/14

References
1. Wald HS, McFarland J, Markovina I. Medical humanities in medical education and practice. Medical Teacher. 2019;41(5):492-6. [DOI]
2. Dhar N, Chaturvedi SK, Nandan D. Spiritual health, the fourth dimension: a public health perspective. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health. 2013;2(1):3-5 [DOI]
3. Hvidt NC, Assing Hvidt E. Religiousness, spirituality and health in secular society: need for spiritual care in health care? Spirituality, Religiousness and Health: From Research to Clinical Practice. 2019:133-52. [DOI]
4. Murgia C, Notarnicola I, Caruso R, De Maria M, Rocco G, Stievano A. Spirituality and religious diversity in nursing: a scoping review. InHealthcare. 2022;10(9):1661. [DOI]
5. Murgia C, Notarnicola I, Rocco G, Stievano A. Spirituality in nursing: a concept analysis. Nursing Ethics. 2020;27(5):1327-43. [DOI]
6. Dubey P, Pathak AK, Sahu KK. Correlates of workplace spirituality on job satisfaction, leadership, organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational growth: a literature-based study from organisational perspective. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2020;9(4):1493-502 [DOI]
7. Mthembu TG, Wegner L, Roman NV. Teaching spirituality and spiritual care in health sciences education: a systematic review. African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences. 2016;22(41):1036-57. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025] [DOI]
8. Crozier D, Greene A, Schleicher M, Goldfarb J. Teaching spirituality to medical students: a systematic review. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 2022;28(3):378-99 [DOI]
9. Wenham J, Best M, Kissane DW. Systematic review of medical education on spirituality. Internal Medicine Journal. 2021;51(11):1781-90. [DOI]
10. Koenig HG. Religion and medicine III: developing a theoretical model. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 2001;31(2):199-216. [DOI]
11. Darvishi A, Otaghi M, Mami S. The effectiveness of spiritual therapy on spiritual well-being, self-esteem and self-efficacy in patients on hemodialysis. Journal of Religion and Health. 2020;59(1):277-88. [DOI]
12. Ford DW, Downey L, Engelberg R, Back AL, Curtis JR. Discussing religion and spirituality is an advanced communication skill: an exploratory structural equation model of physician trainee self-ratings. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2012;15(1):63-70. [DOI]
13. Monroe MH, Bynum D, Susi B, et al. Primary care physician preferences regarding spiritual behavior in medical practice. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003;163(22):2751-6 [DOI]
14. Whitley R. Religious competence as cultural competence. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2012;49(2):245-260 [DOI]
15. Puchalski CM, Blatt B, Kogan M, Butler A. Spirituality and health: the development of a field. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(1):10-16 [DOI]
16. Lucchetti G, Lucchetti ALG, Espinha DCM, de Oliveira LR, Leite JR, Koenig HG. Spirituality and health in the curricula of medical schools in Brazil. BMC Medical Education. 2012;12(1):78. [DOI]
17. Lucchetti G, de Araujo Almeida PO, Martin EZ, et al. The current status of “spirituality and health” teaching in Brazilian medical schools: a nationwide survey. BMC Medical Education. 2023;23(1):172. [DOI]
18. Memaryan N, Rassouli M, Nahardani SZ, Amiri P. Integration of spirituality in medical education in Iran: a qualitative exploration of requirements. Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2015;2015(1):793085. [DOI]
19. Alipour Hafezi M. Expectations of upstream documents from the higher education system. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2024;30(2):1-15. [DOI]
20. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;62(1):107-15. [DOI]
21. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277-88. [DOI]
22. Waterman Jr RH, Peters TJ, Phillips JR. Structure is not organization. Business Horizons. 1980;23(3):14-26. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
23. Shelke T, Sidhu H, Parab V. Mckinsey 7s model: applicability and relevance in educational sector. General Management. 204. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
24. Wang L, Hou C. Analysis of macro environment and development countermeasures of the education industry based on the PEST model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. 2023;8(2):2755-64. [DOI]
25. Datta S, Kutzewski T. The conventional wisdom in strategy. InStrategic optionality: pathways through disruptive uncertainty 2023 Jan 19 (pp. 37-90). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [DOI]
26. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research. 2007;42(4):1758-72. [DOI]
27. Kleinheksel A, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt TR. Demystifying content analysis. American journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2020;84(1):7113 [DOI]
28. Bismark O, Kofi O, Frank A, Eric H. Utilizing Mckinsey 7S model, SWOT analysis, PESTLE and balance scorecard to foster efficient implementation of organizational strategy. Evidence from the community hospital group-Ghana limited. International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management. 2018;2(3):94-113. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
29. Helms MM, Nixon J. Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management. 2010;3(3):215-51. [DOI]
30. Singh A. A study of role of McKinsey's 7S framework in achieving organizational excellence. Organization Development Journal. 2013;31(3):39. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
31. Walsh K, Bhagavatheeswaran L, Roma E. E-learning in healthcare professional education: an analysis of political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental (PESTLE) factors. MedEdPublish. 2019;8(97):97. [DOI]
32. Demir E. The evolution of spirituality, religion and health publications: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Religion and Health. 2019;58(1):1-13 [DOI]
33. Baldacchino D. Spiritual care education of health care professionals. Religions; 2015;6(2):594-613. [DOI]
34. Puchalski CM, Ferrell B, Bauer RW. Interprofessional spiritual care education curriculum. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2024;67(5):e548-e9 [DOI]
35. Hoseini Moghadam M, Hamidi M. The future of interdisciplinarity in higher education: experiences of medical universities in Iran. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities. 2022;14(3):87-122. [DOI]
36. Bolhari J, DOUS AH, Mirzaee M. Spiritual approach in medical education and humanities. 2012. [Persian]. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
37. Harbinson MT, Bell D. How should teaching on whole person medicine, including spiritual issues, be delivered in the undergraduate medical curriculum in the United Kingdom? BMC Medical Education. 2015;15(1):1-13. [DOI]
38. Vermette D, Doolittle B. What educators can learn from the biopsychosocial-spiritual model of patient care: Time for holistic medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2022;37(8):2062-6. [DOI]
39. Nissen RD, Andersen AH. Addressing religion in secular healthcare: existential communication and the post-secular negotiation. Religions. 2021;13(1):34. [DOI]
40. Tavakol M, Murphy R, Torabi S. Medical education in Iran: an exploration of some curriculum issues. Medical Education Online. 2006;11(1):4585. [DOI]
41. Malekpoor N, Abedi F, ArabZozani M, Farrokhfall K. A SWOT analysis of integrating humanities into medical sciences curricula. Future of Medical Education Journal. 2024;14(2). [DOI]
42. Zahedi F, Emami Razavi S, Larijani B. A two-decade review of medical ethics in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2009;38(Suppl 1):40-6. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
43. Sadati AK, Lankarani KB, Falakodin Z, Zanganeh M. Analysis of strategies for integrating humanities with medical sciences in Iran from the perspective of humanities experts with convergence sciences approach. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2020. [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025]. [DOI]
44. Sadati AK, Lankarani KB, Falakodin Z. Modern mentality, domination, and the unequal field of knowledge, resources, and talent: challenges of the formation of medical humanities in Iran. Journal of Applied Sociology (1735-000X). 2021;32(3). [DOI]
45. Cohen AB, Keltner D, Rozin P. Different religions, different emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2004;27(6):734-5. [DOI]
46. Van der Kooij JC, de Ruyter DJ, Miedema S. “Worldview”: the meaning of the concept and the impact on religious education. Religious Education. 2013;108(2):210-28. [DOI]
47. Pasalar M. Persian medicine as a holistic therapeutic approach. Current Drug Discovery Technologies. 2021;18(2):159 [DOI]
48. Zeinalian M, Eshaghi M, Naji H, Marandi SMM, Sharbafchi MR, Asgary S. Iranian-Islamic traditional medicine: an ancient comprehensive personalized medicine. Advanced Biomedical Research. 2015;4(1):191. [DOI]
49. Castillo EG, Isom J, DeBonis KL, Jordan A, Braslow JT, Rohrbaugh R. Reconsidering systems-based practice: advancing structural competency, health equity, and social responsibility in graduate medical education. Academic Medicine. 2020 Dec 1;95(12):1817-22. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.