Sat, May 24, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 17, Issue 56 (2024)
JMED 2024, 17(56): 29-38 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: A67/18/08/003
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Obadeji A, Louw A, Couper I. Medical students’ perceptions of the learning environment and its implications on teaching and learning: A qualitative study in Nigeria. JMED 2024; 17 (56) :29-38
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2170-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2170-en.html
1- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria. , doctunjioba@yahoo.com
2- Centre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Stellenbosch University, South AfricaEducation.
3- Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
2- Centre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Stellenbosch University, South AfricaEducation.
3- Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Abstract: (390 Views)
Background & Objective: With increased interest in understanding the role of the Learning Environment (LE) in effective teaching and learning, this study explores how medical students in Nigeria perceived their LE and its impact on their education.
Material & Methods: A thematic analysis approach was adopted for this qualitative study, using focus group discussion to gather data on students’ experiences. Purposive sampling was used to choose participants after considering the representation of different subgroups and genders in the study population. Four focus groups were conducted to ensure data saturation. Each focus group consisted of eight participants, each with at least two females, a ratio similar to what was obtained in the study population. An interview guide based on some concepts of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) and other areas of interest was employed to navigate the interviews. An inductive thematic analysis involving a line-by-line examination of the transcripts was conducted to generate codes and identify various sub-themes and themes from the data.
Results: Three main themes were identified. The first theme—pedagogical bedrock includes basic necessities, resource sufficiency, and expectations versus realities. These elements contribute to an effective teaching and learning environment, while their absence impedes learning. The second, the Promoters, encompasses factors in the learning environment that facilitate learning and comprises two sub-themes: the learning atmosphere and social perception. The third theme, Proficiency appraisal, focuses on students’ perceived achievement of learning outcomes and the relevance of their learning experiences, incorporating both alignment and strategies.
Conclusion: This research provided a sound understanding of the strengths and challenges in the LE and how these may influence the overall learning outcomes. Focused interventions can ensure an enhanced LE that will ultimately translate to enhanced teaching and learning outcomes.
Material & Methods: A thematic analysis approach was adopted for this qualitative study, using focus group discussion to gather data on students’ experiences. Purposive sampling was used to choose participants after considering the representation of different subgroups and genders in the study population. Four focus groups were conducted to ensure data saturation. Each focus group consisted of eight participants, each with at least two females, a ratio similar to what was obtained in the study population. An interview guide based on some concepts of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) and other areas of interest was employed to navigate the interviews. An inductive thematic analysis involving a line-by-line examination of the transcripts was conducted to generate codes and identify various sub-themes and themes from the data.
Results: Three main themes were identified. The first theme—pedagogical bedrock includes basic necessities, resource sufficiency, and expectations versus realities. These elements contribute to an effective teaching and learning environment, while their absence impedes learning. The second, the Promoters, encompasses factors in the learning environment that facilitate learning and comprises two sub-themes: the learning atmosphere and social perception. The third theme, Proficiency appraisal, focuses on students’ perceived achievement of learning outcomes and the relevance of their learning experiences, incorporating both alignment and strategies.
Conclusion: This research provided a sound understanding of the strengths and challenges in the LE and how these may influence the overall learning outcomes. Focused interventions can ensure an enhanced LE that will ultimately translate to enhanced teaching and learning outcomes.
Article Type : Orginal Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2024/05/3 | Accepted: 2024/08/12 | Published: 2024/12/14
Received: 2024/05/3 | Accepted: 2024/08/12 | Published: 2024/12/14
References
1. Bassaw B, Roff S, McAleer S, et al. Students' perspectives on the educational environment, faculty of medical sciences, Trinidad. Medical Teacher. 2003;25(5):522-6. [DOI]
2. Genn JM. AMEE medical education guide No. 23 (Part 1): curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education–a unifying perspective. Medical Teacher. 2001;23(4):337-44. [DOI]
3. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education. 2002;27(1):27-52. [DOI]
4. Atapattu NS, Kumari KK, Pushpakumara KK, Mudalige SK. Adoption of Dundee DREEM questionnaire to assess the educational environment of an agriculture degree programme. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension. 2016;18(1).
5. Wayne SJ, Fortner SA, Kitzes JA, Timm C, Kalishman S. Cause or effect? The relationship between student perception of the medical school learning environment and academic performance on USMLE Step 1. Medical Teacher. 2013;35(5):376-80. [DOI]
6. Genn JM. AMEE medical education guide No. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education–a unifying perspective. Medical Teacher. 2001;23(5):445-54. [DOI]
7. Griffith CH. The learning environment and medical student burnout. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(8):e2119344. [DOI]
8. Mayya SS, Roff SU. Students′ perceptions of educational environment: a comparison of academic achievers and under-achievers at Kasturba medical college, India. Education for Health. 2004;17(3):280-91. [DOI]
9. Pimparyon P, Roff S, McAleer S, et al. Educational environment, students’ approaches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing school. Medical Teacher. 2000;22(4):359–64. [DOI]
10. Brazeau CM, Schroeder R, Rovi S at al. Relationships between medical student burnout, empathy, and professionalism climate. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(10):S33-6. [DOI]
11. Artino AR, Dong T, DeZee KJ, et al. Achievement goal structures and self-regulated learning: relationships and changes in the medical school. Academic Medicine. 2012;87:1375–81. [DOI]
12. Belaineh MS, Jamaiah I. Students’ conception of learning environment and their approach to learning and its implication on quality education. Educational Research and Reviews. 2017;10(1):695–704. [DOI]
13. Entwistle N, Tait H. Approaches to studying and perceptions of the learning environment across disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 1995;93–103. [DOI]
14. Buhari MA, Nwannadi IA, Oghagbon EK, et al. Students’ perceptions of their learning environment at the college of medicine, university of Ilorin, Southwest, Nigeria. West African Journal of Medicine. 2014;33(2):141–5.
15. Ogun OA, Nottidge TE, Roff S. Students’ perceptions of the learning environment in two Nigerian medical schools offering different curricula. Ghana Medical Journal. 2018;52(3):116–21. [DOI]
16. Okoye O, Ezisi CN, Ezepue FU. Evaluation of the learning and teaching environment of the faculty of medical sciences, college of medicine, university of Nigeria, Enugu Campus. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2017;20(8):958-63. [DOI]
17. Roff SU, McAleer S, Harden RM, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee ready education environment measure (DREEM). Medical Teacher. 1997;19(4):295-9. [DOI]
18. Krueger R, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research.3rd Edition. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. [DOI]
20. Osarenren-Osaghae RI, Irabor QO. Availability and adequacy of human and material resources for the teaching and learning of skill-based courses in Nigeria public universities. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2012;3(1):15-27.
21. Nair DS, Bedekar MY, Agrawal MJ, Gupte AM. Effectiveness of teaching aids in medical education. Annals of Applied Bio-Sciences. 2017;4(1):A58-61. [DOI]
22. Chonkar SP, Ha T, Chu SSH, et al. The predominant learning approaches of medical students. BMC Medical Education. 2018;18(17). [DOI]
23. Boysen-Osborn M. Flipping the advanced cardiac life support classroom with team-based learning: comparison of cognitive testing performance for medical students at the university of California, Irvine, United States. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 2016;13. [DOI]
24. Dagnone JD, McGraw R, Howes D, et al. How we developed a comprehensive resuscitation-based simulation curriculum in emergency medicine. Medical Teacher. 2016;38:30–5. [DOI]
25. Sovacool B, Vera I. Electricity and education: The benefits, barriers, and recommendations for achieving the electrification of primary and secondary schools. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2014. [Accessed. May 4, 2024]. Available from: [DOI]
26. Wilkes M, Raven BH. Understanding social influence in medical education. Academic Medicine. 2002;77:481–8. [DOI]
27. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians: the hidden curriculum as process. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21(Suppl 1):16-20. [DOI]
28. Cuncic C, Regehr G, Frost H, Bates J. It’s all about relationships: a qualitative study of family physicians’ teaching experiences in rural longitudinal clerkships. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2018;7:100-9. [DOI]
29. Tempski P, Santos IS, Mayer FB, et al. Relationship among Medical Student Resilience, Educational Environment and Quality of Life. PloS One. 2015;10(6): e0131535. [DOI]
30. Aghamolaei T, Fazel I. Medical students’ perceptions of the educational environment at an Iranian Medical Sciences University. BMC Medical Education. 2010;10:87. [DOI]
31. Wood DF. Bullying and harassment in medical schools. British Medical Journal. 2006;333(7570):664–5. [DOI]
32. Wearn A, Wilson H, Hawken SJ, Child S, Mitchell CJ. In search of professionalism: implications for medical education. The New Zealand Medical Journal. 2010;123(1314). [PubMed]
33. Berryman E. Bullying culture: valuing the teacher-student relationship. The New Zealand Medical Journal. 2015;128(142):13–7. [DOI]
34. Ramnanan CJ, Pound LD. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2017;13:63-73. [DOI]
35. Obadeji A, Oluwole LO, Adeyemo DA. Exploring learning approaches of undergraduate medical students and their association with gender, resilience, and psychological distress. Health Professions Education. 2023;9(3):6. [DOI]
36. Jalili M, Mirzazadeh A, Azarpira A. A survey of medical students' perceptions of the quality of their medical education upon graduation. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore. 2008;37(12):1012.
37. Manzar B, Manzar N. To determine the level of satisfaction among medical students of a public sector medical university regarding their academic activities. BMC Research Notes. 2011;4(380). [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
