Volume 18, Issue 1 (2025)                   JMED 2025, 18(1): 96-105 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.SKUMS.REC.1400.136


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Roshanzadeh M, Shirvani M, Maraki F, Taj A, Mohammadi S. Clinical learning process of surgical technologist students: a grounded theory. JMED 2025; 18 (1) :96-105
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2118-en.html
1- Department of nursing & operating room, Faculty of nursing, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrehkord, Iran
2- Department of nursing & Operating room, Faculty of nursing, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrehkord, Iran.
3- Department of Medical Emergencies, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iranian Research Center on Healthy Aging, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
4- Department of nursing, Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , s.mohammadi.nfc@gmail.com
Abstract:   (171 Views)
Background & Objective: Identifying the learning process of surgical technologist students in the operating room environment can effectively reveal the factors and strategies they use to learn and enhance the quality of their education. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical learning process of surgical technologist students.
Materials & Methods: This qualitative study employed a grounded theory approach at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences in 2022. Data were gathered through six in-depth individual interviews and three focus groups. Purposeful and theoretical sampling persisted until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data analysis was conducted using MAXQDA10 software.
Results: Thirteen subcategories and four main categories were found. The core variable was self-protection. Students fear making mistakes in the uncertain learning environment and employ flexible strategies, utilizing relationship-oriented approaches to achieve success while avoiding performance that could hinder learning, thereby preventing issues that would protect themselves.
Conclusion: It is essential to enhance students' learning by employing strategies that boost their self-confidence and avoid adhering to the current approach solely for the satisfaction of the training team, thereby preventing numerous negative consequences. Clinical managers are also encouraged to foster an educational atmosphere in the operating room and to cultivate a positive attitude among employees to support student education in these settings. Establishing constructive communication between the clinical environment and the educational system and emphasizing the significance of student education can improve the educational atmosphere in clinical settings.

 
Full-Text [PDF 841 kb]   (18 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (29 Views)  
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2024/02/3 | Accepted: 2024/11/28 | Published: 2025/04/14

References
1. Akyüz E, Ergöl Ş. The challenges experienced by nursing students in clinical learning environment and their suggestions. Journal of Health and Nursing Management. 2022;9(3):463-74. [DOI]
2. Woo MW, Li W. Nursing students' views and satisfaction of their clinical learning environment in Singapore. Nursing Open. 2020;7(6):1909-19. [DOI]
3. Rajeswaran L. Clinical experiences of nursing students at a selected institute of health sciences in Botswana. Health Science Journals. 2017;10(6):471. [DOI]
4. Mthimunye K, Daniels F. Exploring the challenges and efforts implemented to improve the academic performance and success of nursing students at a university in the Western Cape. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2020;12:100196. [DOI]
5. Jafarian-Amiri SR, Zabihi A, Qalehsari MQ. The challenges of supporting nursing students in clinical education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2020;9:216 [DOI]
6. Roshanzadeh M, Shirvani M, Tajabadi A, Khalilzadeh M H, Mohammadi S. The clinical learning challenge of surgery technologist students: a qualitative content analysis. Journal of Payavard Salamat. 2022;16(2):102-112. [DOI]
7. Tang AC, Chow MC. To evaluate the effect of challenge-based learning on the approaches to learning of Chinese nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nursing Education Today. 2020;85:104293. [DOI]
8. Tang FW, & Chan AW. Learning experience of nursing students in a clinical partnership model: An exploratory qualitative analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2019; 75: 6–12. [DOI]
9. Panda S, Dash M, John J, et al. Challenges faced by student nurses and midwives in clinical learning environment–A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Education Today. 2021; 101: 104875. [DOI]
10. Roshanzadeh M, Vanaki Z, Sadooghiasl A, Tajabadi A, Mohammadi S. Explaining courage in ethical decision-making by nursing managers: a qualitative content analysis. Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery. 2021;31(4):254-262. [DOI]
11. Kim AS, Hong E, Kang YG, Brandt C, Kim Y. Effect of Korean nursing students’ experience of incivility in clinical settings on critical thinking. Heliyon. 2020; 6(7):e04367. [DOI]
12. Moyimane MB, Matlala SF, Kekana MP. Experiences of nurses on the critical shortage of medical equipment at a rural district hospital in South Africa: a qualitative study. Pan African Medical Journal. 2017;28:100. [DOI]
13. Berhe S, Gebretensaye T. Nursing students challenges towards clinical learning environment at the school of nursing and midwifery in Addis Ababa university. A qualitative study. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2021;15:100378. [DOI]
14. Sweet L, Broadbent J. Nursing students' perceptions of the qualities of a clinical facilitator that enhance learning. Nurse Education in Practice. 2017;22:30-6. [DOI]
15. Chan AW, Tang FW, Choi KC, Liu T, Taylor-Piliae RE. Clinical learning experiences of nursing students using an innovative clinical partnership model: a non-randomized controlled trial. Nursing Education Today. 2018;68:121-7. [DOI]
16. Mirzaei R, Borhani F, Fasihi T. Nursing students̕ perception of clinical learning environments: qualitative study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2015;4(1):1-11. [DOI]
17. Shivers E, Hasson F, Slater P. Pre-registration nursing student's quality of practice learning: clinical learning environment inventory (actual) questionnaire. Nurse Education Today. 2017;55:58–64. [DOI]
18. Ekstedt M, Lindblad M, Lofmark A. Nursing students’ perception of the clinical learning environment and supervision in relation to two different supervision models – a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing. 2019;18:49. [DOI]
19. Mbakaya BC, Kalembo FW, Zgambo M, et al, Simango M and Bvumbwe T. Nursing and midwifery students’ experiences and perception of their clinical learning environment in Malawi: a mixedmethod study. BMC Nursing. 2020;19:87 [DOI]
20. Najafi Kalyani M, Jamshidi N, Molazem Z, et al. How do nursing students experience the clinical learning environment and respond to their experiences? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e028052. [DOI]
21. World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4. [DOI]
22. Roshanzadeh M, Taj A, Davoodvand S, Mohammadi S. Consequences of exposure of operating room students to clinical learning challenges. JMED 2024; 16 (52) :37-44. [DOI]
23. Johnson JL, Adkins D, Chauvin S. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2020;84(1):7120. [DOI]
24. Zardosht R, Karimi Moonaghi H. Operating Room Culture to Develop Students' Clinical Education in Iran: Hierarchical or Collaborative? J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2020; 7:136-7. [DOI]
25. Sayadi M, Vahabi A, Roshani D, Vahabi B. Nursing student’s perspective regarding the clinical learning environment and the factors affecting it in 2015. Scientific Journal of Nursing Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty. 2016;2(3):33-45. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.