Volume 16, Issue 52 (2024)                   JMED 2024, 16(52): 45-54 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1400.388


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zadi Akhuleh O, Lotfi M, Rahmani V, Sheikhalipour Z, behshid M, Khodayari M et al . Self-directed learning ability and its relationship with perceived perioperative competence in the senior undergraduate surgical technology students: A cross-sectional study. JMED 2024; 16 (52) :45-54
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1760-en.html
1- Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
2- Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
3- Department of Operating Room, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran. , vahid.rahmani.73@gmail.com
4- Department of Public Health, School of Allied Medical sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
5- Department of Midwifery, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 374 kb]   (770 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2139 Views)
Full-Text:   (1065 Views)
Abstract
Background & Objective
: Self-directed learning (SDL) as an effective strategy in surgical technology students can significantly help to improve their skills and clinical competence. The present study aimed to determine SDL ability and its relationship with Perceived Perioperative Competence in senior undergraduate surgical technology students.

Materials & Methods: The present descriptive study was conducted based on a cross-sectional design. This research included 207 final-year surgical technology students via the census method. Data collection tools included a demographic characteristics form, the Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) developed by Su-Fen Cheng (2010), and the Perceived Perioperative Competence scale. After collecting the data, they were analyzed in  SPSS version software (version 20).
Results: The mean SDL and clinical competence scores were reported as 73.8±8.9(intermediate level) and 107.2±17.3 (intermediate level), respectively. Among various dimensions of perceived clinical competence, interaction with colleagues had the highest value (3.4±0.6). Among the dimensions of SDL, interpersonal communication obtained the highest value (3.8±0.4). To investigate the relationship between SDL and clinical competence, Kendall's Tau and Spearman's correlation coefficients were obtained at 0.601 and 0.794, respectively, pointing to the significant positive relationship between the two variables (P<0.001).
Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, the SDL ability predicts the clinical competence of surgical technology students; therefore, revising the curricula of surgical technology students at the BS level and paying attention to the principle of student-centeredness in the education process, along with conducting training courses on SDL principles, can improve students' clinical competence.

Introduction

Clinical competence is one of the requirements of nursing in clinical environments. Competency is an essential component of nursing care which plays an important role in the quality of services provided by nurses. Competence is a set of knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, and abilities that increase efficiency and effectiveness in professional work environments (1). Evaluation of clinical competence is important not only to ensure the safety and quality of care but also to identify the areas that need improvement and determine the educational needs of nurses (2, 3). The assessment of the clinical competence of employees in all departments of hospitals is essential to ensure the quality and safety of care. Among hospital departments, the operating room department is of great importance due to invasive procedures and the critical role of surgical nurses in the quality of services (4). The operating room is one of the most complex work environments in health care, which requires a high level of technology, knowledge, and competence in effective coordination and management. Consequently, it is necessary to strengthen the necessary knowledge and skills of students and operating room experts in the operating room environment (5).
Today, the operating room environment requires staff who can work independently at a competent level, while staff and managers express concern about the performance of new graduates. Therefore, the first work challenge, to ensure that students have high levels of competence, is presented when they are about to graduate (6). Graduates of operating room technology are important members of the health team who work in close contact with surgeons and anesthetists in order to provide patients with optimal care. This field is dependent on practical and clinical skills so that the first mistake in surgery can be the last one, causing life-altering injuries or even death (7, 8). One of the main current issues is the unfavorable clinical competence of nurses, especially in the operating room departments, which has caused problems in providing services. It is evident that nurses without the necessary skills can endanger the health of society. In a study conducted by Rashidi et al. on operating room technicians, they concluded that the clinical competence of most participants was not in favorable condition (5). Among the effective factors in clinical competence, we can refer to experience, environment, use of opportunities, motivation, theoretical knowledge, personal characteristics, and emotional intelligence (10).
Self-directed learning is another factor that can play a major role in creating clinical competence in doctors and nurses and is one of the main elements of problem-solving ability (9). The concept of self-directed learning, which originated from adult education and has received the attention of educational and organizational environments due to its advantages, is a necessary skill for education and work in the 21st century. Self-directed learning has a wide conceptual meaning ranging from self-taught learning, independent learning, non-traditional learning, open learning, cooperative learning, self-teaching, and self-regulating learning to self-planning learning (10). Among the characteristics of self-directed learning are self-control, self-management, as well as motivation for learning, and problem-solving, in order to achieve the best learning results (11). Therefore, the concept of "lifelong learning" has been considered one of the keys to education in the 21st century, which requires implementation strategies. Furthermore,  students expect that after graduation and in their professional life as therapists, they will learn self-directed learning by recognizing their weaknesses in knowledge and problem-solving. The achievement of these goals requires strengthening self-directed learning skills (12, 13). Therefore, self-directed learning is recognized as an essential learning ability.
Nonetheless, the level of self-directed learning ability varies from country to country. Nursing students in Italy and Nepal have their self-directed learning ability as high (14, 15), while nursing students in South Korea and the United Kingdom have evaluated their ability as average (16, 17). Among domestic studies, we can refer to the study by Sohrabi et al., which reported that nursing students were highly prepared for self-directed learning (18). Considering the concept of self-directed learning, especially the concepts of being independent, responsible, and goal-oriented, it is assumed that there is a positive relationship and correlation between this construct and clinical competence. Moreover, the literature review did not retrieve any study on the relationship between self-directed learning as a new strategy in medical education and the clinical competence of operating room students. The discipline of the operating room in almost all universities/faculties of medical sciences in the country is presented with a serious problem of shortage of faculty members as a result of the shortage of graduates from post-graduate studies(19). Therefore, self-directed learning as an effective strategy for students can help improve their skills and clinical competence. In light of the aforementioned issues, the present study aimed to determine the relationship between self-directed learning ability and clinical competence in final-year surgical technology students in East Azarbaijan universities.

Materials & Methods
Design and setting
This descriptive study was conducted based on a correlational cross-sectional design. The statistical population in this research were final-year surgical technology students in medical sciences universities in East Azarbaijan province (Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz Azad University, and Sarab Azad University). This study was carried out from February 2020 to October 2022.
Participants and sampling
The participants were selected via the census method. The surgical technology students who were willing to participate in the study and were studying in the seventh and eighth semesters entered the study. Partially completed questionnaires incompletely (less than 90% of the items) or those with similar answers were excluded from the study. Out of a total of 215 final-year surgical technology undergraduate students, 209 cases (response rate: 97.2%) participated in the present study. Two partially completed questionnaires were excluded, and finally, 207 cases (95.8%) constituted the final samples of this study. To implement this study, after approving the proposal and obtaining the code of ethics from the Medical Education Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, the Perceived Perioperative Competence scale and Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) were completed by the studied students after obtaining informed consent.
Tools/Instruments
First part: The tool used to collect information in this research consisted of three parts. The first part of the questionnaire is related to the personal and social characteristics of the surgical technology students. Individual and social characteristics of students include age, gender, marital status, and grade point average.
The second part: The second instrument was The Self-Directed Learning Instrument (SDLI) developed by Su-Fen Cheng (2010), which consists of 20 items across the following four domains: learning motivation (items 1-6), planning and implementing (items 7-12), self-monitoring (items 13-16), and interpersonal communication ( items17-20). The answers to these questions are graded on a five-point Likert scale from completely disagree to completely agree. A score of 1 is assigned to completely disagree, and a score of 5 is assigned to completely agree. Therefore, the minimum score for the entire questionnaire will be 20, and the maximum score will be 100. According to the difference in the number of items in each dimension, the average scores obtained in each dimension were reported between 1 and 5.
The content and construct validity of this questionnaire were confirmed, and the reliability of the total scale was calculated, rendering a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.916 for the entire questionnaire and 0.801, 0.861, and 0.785 for the mentioned dimensions, respectively. (20). This questionnaire was prepared and used in Iran for the first time in the study by Ahanchian et al. (2015) using the method of translation and double translation. Moreover, its content validity was confirmed by subject and methodology experts, and its reliability was estimated by the internal consistency method rendering a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.94(11). In the current study, the reliability of the tool was obtained between 0.76 and 0.89 using Cronbach's alpha method.
The third part: The third tool includes the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale, which has 33 items and five dimensions. The dimensions of this questionnaire include fundamental knowledge and skills (7 items), leadership (9 items), collegiality (7 items), Proficiency(4 items), and professional development (6 items). The answers to these questions are rated on a five-point Likert scale from never to always. A score of 1 is assigned to never, and a score of 5 is assigned to always. Therefore, the minimum score obtained for the entire questionnaire will be 33, and the maximum score will be 165. According to the difference in the number of items in each dimension, the average score obtained in each dimension is reported between 1 and 5.
Gillespie et al. (2012) obtained the validity of this tool by the content validity method and reported the reliability of the whole tool by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole questionnaire as 0.96(21). psychometric assessment of this questionnaire was performed in Iran for the first time in the study by Ajorpaz et al. (2017) and by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.86. In addition,  its content validity was confirmed by 10 faculty members of the operating room departments of Kashan and Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (22). In the present study, the reliability of this tool was checked again using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and it was estimated at 88%.
Data collection method
Sampling was performed online. The questionnaire was designed in an online format. The questionnaire link was provided to the students along with the explanation letter about the research objectives and satisfaction in the messaging groups. After completion, the questionnaires were checked in terms of answering rate, and incomplete questionnaires were removed. All questionnaires were distributed and collected by a member of the research team.
Data analysis
The collected data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 20). Descriptive statistics (frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation) were used to describe and categorize the data, and inferential statistics were used to test the hypothesis. Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to check the normal distribution of data. In order to determine the relationship of perceived clinical competence and its dimensions with self-directed learning and its dimensions, Kendall's Tau and Spearman tests were used. In all the tests used, the confidence level of 95% and the significance level of 0.05 were considered.

Results

The mean age of the study subjects was 22.98±1 years. In terms of gender, 109 (52.7%) cases were female, and 98 (47.3%) subjects were male. Moreover,  111 (53.6%) of them were eighth-semester students, and 96 (46.4%)cases were seventh-semester students. Among the studied subjects, 77 (37.2%) cases were surgical technology students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), 57 (27.5%) were students of Maragheh University of Medical Sciences(MUMC), 36 (17.4%) were students of Azad University of Tabriz (AUT), and 37 ( 17.9%) were students of Azad University of Sarab(AUS) (Table 1).
 
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants
Qualitative variables Frequency Percentage
Gender Male 98 47.3
Female 109 52.7
Semester 7 96 46.4
8 111 53.6
Interest in the major Yes 165 79.7
No 42 20.3
University TUMS 77 37.2
MUMS 57 27.5
AUS 37 17.9
AUT 36 17.4
Quantitative variables Mean SD
Age 22.49 1.51
Grade average           16.87 1.12

Findings related to the self-directed learning ability in the final year surgical technology undergraduate students demonstrated that the total mean score of self-directed learning was equal to 73.87±8.9 (range 20 to 100), which is at the average level. As displayed in Figure 1, among the different dimensions of self-directed learning ability, the dimensions of interpersonal communication (3.825±0.473) and motivation to learn (3.787±0.50) had the highest values, respectively, while the dimension of planning and implementation had the lowest value (3.312±0.48). The findings related to the perceived clinical competence in the final year undergraduate surgical technology students showed that the total mean score of clinical competence was equal to 107.25±17.38 (range 33 to 165), which is an average level. As illustrated in  Figure 2, among the various dimensions of perceived clinical competence, the dimensions of collegiality (3.401±0.60) and fundamental knowledge and skills (3.257±0.638) had the highest values, respectively, while the dimension of leadership had the lowest value (3.138±0.537).
 
Figure 1. Mean of different dimensions of self-directed learning in surgical technology students

Figure 2. Mean of different dimensions of clinical competence in surgical technology students

Since the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro Wilk tests illustrated that the investigated variables did not have a normal distribution (P<0.05), to further investigate the relationship between the two variables of self-directed learning ability and clinical competence, Spearman's non-parametric correlation coefficients and Kendall's tau were used. Kendall's Tau and Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.601 and 0.794, respectively. These indicators indicated that the two variables had a significant positive relationship with each other; that is to say, an elevation in self-directed learning ability in surgical technology students leads to an increase in their clinical competence. Both correlation coefficient indices point to a significant relationship and the P-value values of both are less than 0.001. In order to check the relationship between the two variables, we drew the scatter plot of the two variables and fitted the non-parametric Loess correlation curve. As illustrated, with an elevation in self-directed learning ability, the clinical competence of surgical technology students increases almost linearly (Figure 3).
 
Figure 3. Scatter plot related to the relationship between self-directed learning (SDL) and perceived clinical competence (PCC) in surgical technology students
Discussion
Based on the results of this study, the status of self-directed learning ability was evaluated at an average level. Previous studies indicate the difference in the level of readiness for self-directed learning among students in different studies. This variety seems logical due to the fact that the level of self-directed learning ability is a context-oriented issue and is affected by various environmental, cultural, social, and even economic factors. For example, in the study by Naranja Sani et al., which was conducted on graduate students of Tehran University, the students under study had a high level of self-directed learning ability (23). The study by Visiers-Jiménez et al., which was performed in several European countries, showed that nursing students had a high level of readiness for self-directed learning (13). In a similar vein, in the study by Örs in Turkey, nursing and midwifery students were relatively well prepared for self-directed learning (24). While the studies by Bahrami et al. in Iran and Lee et al. in South Korea yielded similar results, and nursing students were moderately prepared for self-directed learning (16, 25). The results of the present study suggested that among different dimensions of self-directed learning, surgical technology students were the most prepared in the dimensions of interpersonal communication and learning motivation, respectively.
In line with the results of the present research, in the study by Bahrami et al., the highest mean among the dimensions of self-directed learning in nursing students was related to interpersonal communication (25). Interpersonal communication skills are a person's ability to communicate with others in order to fulfill their needs, desires, rights, and obligations in an acceptable manner without harming their needs and desires. The components of interpersonal communication skills based on the theme analysis include interaction and willingness to work in a group, the ability to communicate correctly, and group decision-making for problem-solving and learning. Although self-directed learners are autonomous, they need to interact with classmates and learners in order to change the existing information (26). According to PillingCormick et al., the self-directed learning process revolves around the teacher and the student. In this model, the teacher and the student do not act independently in the learning process, and the balance between the teacher, student, and classmates is recognized as learning processes and learning facilitators. In explaining this finding, it can be stated that if learners do not have proper interpersonal communication skills, they will be vulnerable in many aspects of life and education.
Effective interpersonal communication transfers emotions, opinions, thoughts, and ideas between people; moreover, it guarantees the growth of the individual and society (27). In the study by Cheng et al. and Ahanchian et al., among the dimensions of self-directed learning, students had the highest level of readiness and ability in the dimension of learning motivation (11, 28), while in the present study, this dimension ranked second. Motivation is the driving force behind many activities, including learning. In other words, there is a motivation behind any behavior. In fact, motivation is what gives energy to the learner and guides his activities. Learning motivation has been described as an important factor in effective nursing practice. Moreover,  motivation plays a significant role in explaining behaviors, predicting the effects of actions, and guiding behavior in order to achieve goals (29). In their study. Hassankhani et al. observed that increasing learning motivation could be related to improving self-efficacy in professional competence in nursing students (30). Based on the results of this study, the perceived clinical competence in the final-year operating room students was at an average level. In a study conducted by Naderi Beh Rad et al., which examined the clinical competence of the operating room students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, it was observed that they had a high level of clinical competence (31).
In a similar vein, in the study by Imeni et al., the clinical competence of surgical technology students was evaluated at a good level (32). The results of the study by Atmani et al., which was conducted on nursing students of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, showed that the average overall score of nurses' clinical competence was at a high level (33). This discrepancy in results can be ascribed to differences in the instrument used for measuring clinical competence in operating room students. Other reasons can be differences in research environments and the occupational nature of the group under investigation(i.e., nursing students compared to operating room students). Furthermore, competency is a complex and ambiguous concept that encompasses a wide range of preparations in different cognitive, communication, value, and psychomotor dimensions (34). Therefore, the difference in the conceptualization of competency in various studies can lead to different results. The study by Khashei et al., which was conducted on nursing students of Islamic Azad Universities in Isfahan province, yielded similar results, and nursing students had average clinical competence (35). Evaluation of clinical competence is necessary to ensure the achievement of minimum professional standards and readiness to play a role (34).
Considering that universities are obliged to train graduates with sufficient ability to prevent, treat and promote the health of society, it seems that the curricula of medical sciences universities in surgical technology discipline do not meet the expected goals to access the desired clinical competence for providing care services among the students of this field. The results of the present study showed that surgical technology students had the highest level of competence among the different dimensions of clinical competence, respectively, in the dimension of interaction with colleagues and basic knowledge and skills. In the study by Naderi Beh Rad et al. (31) and Imeni et al. (32), surgical technology students had the highest level of competence in the dimension of critical thinking, which is not in line with the results of the present study. In agreement with the results of the present research, in the study of Ilona Ābele et al. in Latvia, the highest mean among the dimensions of clinical competence in operating room nurses was related to interaction with colleagues. Also52, in the study of Vaqei et al., the competence of nurses in the dimension of interpersonal communication was more than in other dimensions (36).
In their research, Wonz and Bargiel came to the conclusion that nowadays, in order to acquire professional and clinical qualifications, in addition to practical skills and knowledge, nurses need the ability to communicate and interact effectively with colleagues, solve problems, make appropriate decisions, and make correct judgments in different situations (37). According to the results of the present study, it can be concluded that the final year operating room students have achieved good qualifications in this field (interaction with colleagues). In the operating room, as a unit where coordination, speed of action, and quality of services assume critical importance, special attention should be devoted to teamwork and effective communication with colleagues. Failure in communication and lack of teamwork in the operating room lead to problems that result in jeopardizing patient safety, interrupting routine work, and increasing tension (38). The study of behaviors in the operating room shows that failure in non-technical skills, such as interaction with colleagues in the operating room, is not rare and can cause adverse consequences and heavy losses (39). The present study is the first research in the field of assessing the relationship between self-directed learning ability and perceived clinical competence in operating room students. The research results pointed to a significant direct relationship between these two variables. This means that an elevation in self-directed learning ability increases the clinical competence of surgical technology students.
Consistent with the findings of the present research, the results of the study by Yang et al.(40) in China, which was conducted to investigate nursing students' readiness for self-directed learning and its relationship with clinical competence, showed that there is a strong significant relationship between these two variables. Along the same lines, the study by Vasli et al. (2022) showed that self-directed learning in nursing students had a significant positive relationship with their clinical competence (41). In another study in South Korea, a significant positive relationship was observed between self-directed learning and clinical competence (42). In 2014, Jho et al. carried out a study to assess the effect of self-directed learning ability and metacognition on the clinical competence of nursing students, and the results indicated a significant direct relationship between the two variables of self-directed learning ability and clinical competence(43).
  
Conclusion
The results of the present study pointed out a significant relationship between self-directed learning ability and perceived clinical competence; moreover, self-directed learning predicted the clinical competence of surgical technology students. Considering the fact that the goal of any educational system is to train individuals who are specialized and equipped with up-to-date knowledge of their profession, it is necessary to take the necessary measures to solve small and minor problems as well. Reviewing the curricula of surgical technology students at the BS level and paying attention to the principle of student-centeredness in the learning process, in addition to holding short and long-term training courses on the principles of self-directed learning, can help improve students' clinical competence.

Ethical Considerations
This Research was supported by Tabriz Medical Education Research Center (Grant numbers: 1400-05-11-66887). And the project’s compliance with the ethical code was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR.TBZMED.REC.1400.388).
Acknowledgments
The researchers express their gratitude to all the surgical technology students who cooperated sincerely in this research.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Authors’ contribution
O. Zadi Akhuleh (first author): generating research ideas, writing articles, project management, revising the text.
M. Lotfi: writing the article, revising and correcting the text.
Z. Sheikhalipour and M. Behshid: generating research ideas, revising the text
V. Rahmani(corresponding author): writing the article, collecting data
MT. Khodayari: Data analysis




 
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2022/11/4 | Accepted: 2023/03/17 | Published: 2024/03/16

References
1. Faraji A, Karimi M, Azizi SM, Janatolmakan M, Khatony A. Evaluation of clinical competence and its related factors among ICU nurses in Kermanshah-Iran: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2019;6(4):421-425. [DOI]
2. Abbasi S, Masoudi R, Rabiei L, Shahbazi K. The Effect of Assertiveness Program on Clinical Competence of Intensive Care Units Nurses; A Randomized Clinical Trial. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care .2019; 27 (5) :293-305. [Article] [DOI]
3. Park K, Ahn Y, Kang N, Sohn M. Development of a simulation-based assessment to evaluate the clinical competencies of Korean nursing students. Nurse education today. 2016;36:337-41. [DOI]
4. Lotfi M, Sheikhalipour Z, Zamanzadeh V, Aghazadeh A, Zadi Akhuleh O. Observance of preventive standards against COVID-19 transmission in operating rooms: A cross-sectional study. Perioperoperative Care and Opererating Room Managment.2021;25:100212. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Rashidi N, Raadabadi M, Ramezanpour E. Viewpoints of Surgical Technologists about Their Clinical Competence in Medical-Educational Hospitals of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2018. Journal of Nursing Education. 2020;8(6):41-7. [Article]
6. Sharif M, Mirbagher Ajorpaz N, Arandian N. Effects of Mastery Learning Model on Clinical Competencies in the Operating Room Students. Community Health Journal. 2017;10(3):11-8.
7. Zadi Akhule O, Lotfi M, Nasiri E, Chalangari S, Torkali pur Y. Survey of the Performance of Operating Room Personnel Regarding the Observance of Surgical Safety Principles in Hospitals of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2019. Payavard salamat 2021; 14 (6) :484-496. [DOI]
8. Imani F, Zadi Akhule O, Memarbashi E, Nasiri E. Link between Occupational Fatigue and Medical Errors in Surgical Technologists. Archives of Occupational Health. 2020;4(4):856-62. [DOI]
9. Naeimi L, Bigdeli S, Soltani Arabshahi K. Level of self-directed learning readiness in medical students. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2012;5(3):177-81. [Article]
10. Mohsenizadeh M, Kareshki H, Meshkin A, Soodmand P. Validation of Self-directed Learning Ability Scale for Nursing Student. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2019;12(1):23-8. [Article] [DOI]
11. Ahanchian M R, Assarroudi A. The Relationship between decision –making style and self-directed learning in Anesthesiology students. Military Caring Sciences. 2015; 2 (1):24-32. [DOI]
12. Wen C-N, Huang C-G, Chang P-Y, Yang T-H, You H-L, Ning H-C, et al. Application of the electronic book to promote self-directed learning in medical technologist continuing education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):713. [DOI]
13. Visiers‐Jiménez L, Palese A, Brugnolli A, Cadorin L, Salminen L, Leino‐Kilpi H, et al. Nursing students’ self‐directed learning abilities and related factors at graduation: A multi‐country cross‐sectional study. Nursing open. 2022;9(3):1688-99. [DOI]
14. Koirala N, Kafle Sp, Koirala A. Factors affecting self-directed learning readiness of the undergraduate nursing students from purbanchal university, nepal: a cross-sectional study. Journal of chitwan medical college. 2021;11(3):31-5. [DOI]
15. Cadorin L, Cheng S-F, Palese A. Concurrent validity of self-rating scale of self-directed learning and self-directed learning instrument among Italian nursing students. BMC nursing. 2016;15(1):1-10. [DOI]
16. Lee S, Kim DH, Chae S-M. Self-directed learning and professional values of nursing students. Nurse education in practice. 2020;42:102647. [DOI]
17. Williamson SN. Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse researcher. 2007;14(2). [DOI]
18. Sohrabi S, Habibi A, Arabzadeh N. Assessment of self-directed learning readiness in nursing students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2020. Journal of Nursing Education. 2022;10(6):44-52. [DOI]
19. Zardosht R, Karimi Moonaghi H. Clinical Instructor Criteria in operating room: Qualitative content analysis. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.2021; 28(2):156-163. [Article]
20. Cheng SF, Kuo CL, Lin KC, Lee-Hsieh J. Development and preliminary testing of a self-rating instrument to measure self-directed learning ability of nursing students. International journal of nursing studies. 2010;47(9):1152-8. [DOI]
21. Gillespie BM, Polit DF, Hamlin L, Chaboyer W. Developing a model of competence in the operating theatre: psychometric validation of the perceived perioperative competence scale-revised. International journal of nursing studies. 2012;49(1):90-101. [DOI]
22. Ajorpaz NM, Tafreshi MZ, Mohtashami J, Zayeri F, Rahemi Z. Psychometric Testing of the Persian Version of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised. Journal of nursing measurement. 2017;25(3):162-72. [DOI]
23. Narenjithani F, Keramati M, Hosseinisohi M. The role of self-directed learning in the effectiveness of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 2022;16(3):571-89. [DOI]
24. Örs M. The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Level of the Undergraduate Students of Midwife and Nurse in Terms of Sustainability in Nursing and Midwifery Education. Sustainability. 2018;10(10):3574. [DOI]
25. Bahrami M, Sabeghi H, Zohourparvaz M, Karimi Moonaghi H. Relationship between Educational Environment and Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Student in COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2022;15(45):47-56.[] [DOI]
26. Jafari A, Nadi MA. Qualitative Analysis of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Training. Journal of Nursing Education (JNE). 2022;11(2):64-78. [DOI]
27. Pilling-Cormick J, Garrison DR. Self-directed and self-regulated learning: Conceptual links. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education. 2007;33(2). [DOI]
28. Cheng SF, Lee-Hsieh J, Turton MA, Lin KC. Validation of self-directed learning instrument and establishment of normative data for nursing students in taiwan: using polytomous item response theory. The journal of nursing research : JNR. 2014;22(2):90-100. [DOI]
29. Bahari G, Alharbi Kn, Alenazi L. Learning motivation and self-efficacy towards improved clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Journal of clinical & diagnostic research. 2022;16(2).
30. Hassankhani H, Aghdam AM, Rahmani A, Mohammadpoorfard Z. The relationship between learning motivation and self efficacy among nursing students. Research and Development in Medical Education. 2014;4(1):97-101. [DOI]
31. Naderi Behrad R, Imani B, Rezvani S. Correlation between Spiritual Intelligence and Clinical Competency of Operating Room and Anesthesia Students Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Pajouhan Scientific Journal. 2020;18(4):24-30. [DOI]
32. Imani B, Zandyeh M, Mahdiyoun A. The Effect of Emotional Intelligence on the Clinical Competency. Journal of Nursing Education. 2019;7(3):63-9. [Article]
33. Atmani M, Jasemi Khalyani M, Radfar M, Khalkhali. Investigating the relationship between perception of clinical learning environment with clinical competence in nursing students of urmia university of medical sciences in 2019. nursing and midwifery journal. 2021;19(6):427-36. [DOI]
34. Ezzati R, Tafazoli M, Mazlom SR, Asgharipour N. Evaluation of the extent of achieving clinical competencies in midwifery students and its relation with some of the demographic factors. Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2018;16(9):678-85. [Article]
35. Khashei S, Ziaeirad M. The relationship between moral intelligence and clinical competence of nursing students in the internship course. nursing and midwifery journal. 2021;19(6):437-48. [DOI]
36. Karimi-Moonaghi H, Gazerani A, Vaghee S, Gholami H, Salehmoghaddam AR, Gharibnavaz R. Relation between spiritual intelligence and clinical competency of nurses in Iran. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. 2015;20(6):665-669. [DOI]
37. Wons A, Bargiel-Matusiewicz K. The emotional intelligence and coping with stress among medical students. Wiadomosci Lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960). 2011;64(3):181-7.
38. Mousavi E, Aarabi A, Adel Mehraban M, Mojdeh S. A Survey of Healthcare Team Work and its Related Factors in Operating Room. Paramedical Sciences and Military Health. 2019;14(2):3947. [Article]
39. Yule S, Flin R, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G, Paterson-Brown S. Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World journal of surgery. 2008;32(4):548-56. [DOI]
40. Yang G-F, Jiang X-Y. Self-directed learning readiness and nursing competency among undergraduate nursing students in Fujian province of China. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2014;1(3):255-9. [DOI]
41. Vasli P, Asadiparvar-Masouleh H. Effects of self-directed learning on clinical competence and the mediating role of clinical learning environment among internship nursing students: A structural equation modeling approach. Research Square; 2022.
42. Yang J-J, Park M-Y. The relationship of clinical competency and self-directed learning in nursing students. The Journal of Korean academic society of nursing education. 2004;10(2):271-7.
43. Jho MY, Chae M-O. Impact of self-directed learning ability and metacognition on clinical competence among nursing students. The Journal of Korean academic society of nursing education. 2014;20(4):513-22.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.