Volume 6, Issue 10 (2013)                   JMED 2013, 6(10): 50-55 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Keshtkaran A, kaffashi S, Sadeghifar J. A Study on the Relationship between Thinking Styles and Preference Learning Methods among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences . JMED 2013; 6 (10) :50-55
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-128-en.html
1- , shahnaz.kaffashi@gmail.com
2- shiraz medical university
Abstract:   (27326 Views)
Background and Objective: Learning is an important area of research in psychology. Learning is a difficult term to define. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between thinking styles and preference learning methods among students of management and medical information collage in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. 136 first and second year students of Management and Medical Information studying in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were selected. Data gathering tools were VARK and Robert J. Strasburg questionnaires. Data was analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics, T-test, and Pearson correlation formula. Results: Students thinking styles and preference learning methods were directly related. Results showed that there was a significant difference between responses to the questionnaires (p≤0.05). Judging style related to writing – reading method (p≤0.05). Conclusion: As the results between thinking styles and preference learning methods were directly related, teachers and administrators can use these results to increase educational quality. This may be a way to change learning system.
Full-Text [PDF 279 kb]   (6708 Downloads)    
Article Type : Orginal Research | Subject: Medical Education
Received: 2012/12/7 | Accepted: 2013/07/28 | Published: 2013/07/28

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.