Sun, Nov 8, 2026
[Archive]
Volume 19, Issue 1 (2026)
J Med Edu Dev 2026, 19(1): 92-96 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.ZUMS.REC.1401.160
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karimkhanlooei G, Abdollahi Sabet S, Pashazadeh F. Self-directed learning readiness among medical students: an observational study. , J Med Edu Dev. 2026; 19 (1) :92-96
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2584-en.html
URL: http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2584-en.html
1- Department of English Language, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
2- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran ,gitikarimkhanlooei@gmail.com
3- School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
2- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran ,
3- School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
Abstract: (841 Views)
Background & Objective: Self-Directed Learning (SDL) is essential for medical students to develop lifelong learning skills. This study aimed to evaluate SDL readiness and examine how demographic characteristics affect medical students at Zanjan University of Medical Sciences.
Materials & Methods: We used a cross-sectional design with 201 purposefully sampled medical students. Data were collected using Fisher’s 40-item validated SDL readiness instrument, available in Persian. We analyzed the data using SPSS version 26 with independent-samples t-tests and a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: The mean SDL score was 160.88 ± 17.25, showing high readiness based on scale criteria. No differences in SDL scores were found between males and females (p = 0.448) or by educational level (p = 0.414). SDL scores were significantly lower for students aged 19–21 compared to those aged 22–23 (p = 0.014) or ≥ 24 years (p = 0.017).
Conclusion: Overall, SDL readiness is high and positively associated with age and maturity, rather than educational level or gender. This suggests teaching methods should be included in the curriculum to create environments where self-directed learning can thrive, particularly for younger medical students.
Materials & Methods: We used a cross-sectional design with 201 purposefully sampled medical students. Data were collected using Fisher’s 40-item validated SDL readiness instrument, available in Persian. We analyzed the data using SPSS version 26 with independent-samples t-tests and a one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: The mean SDL score was 160.88 ± 17.25, showing high readiness based on scale criteria. No differences in SDL scores were found between males and females (p = 0.448) or by educational level (p = 0.414). SDL scores were significantly lower for students aged 19–21 compared to those aged 22–23 (p = 0.014) or ≥ 24 years (p = 0.017).
Conclusion: Overall, SDL readiness is high and positively associated with age and maturity, rather than educational level or gender. This suggests teaching methods should be included in the curriculum to create environments where self-directed learning can thrive, particularly for younger medical students.
Editorial: Original Research |
Subject:
Medical Education
Received: 2025/09/9 | Accepted: 2025/12/11 | Published: 2026/01/1
Received: 2025/09/9 | Accepted: 2025/12/11 | Published: 2026/01/1
References
1. Knowles MS. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Chicago: Association Press; 1975.
2. Bhandari B, Chopra D, Singh K. Self-directed learning: assessment of students' abilities and their perspective. Adv Physiol Educ. 2020;44(3):383-6. [DOI:10.1152/advan.00010.2020] [PMID]
3. Towle A, Cottrell D. Self directed learning. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74(4):357-9. [DOI:10.1136/adc.74.4.357] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Wong FMF, Tang ACY, Cheng WLS. Factors associated with self-directed learning among undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;104:104998. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104998] [PMID]
5. Wu H, Li S, Zheng J, Guo J. Medical students' motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1742964. [DOI:10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Ainoda N, Onishi H, Yasuda Y. Definitions and goals of "self-directed learning" in contemporary medical education literature. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005;34(8):515-9.
https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V34N8p515 [DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V34N8P515] [PMID]
7. Walsh K, Maloney S. Self-directed learning using clinical decision support: costs and outcomes. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018;79(7):408-9. [DOI:10.12968/hmed.2018.79.7.408] [PMID]
8. Fasce E, Pérez C, Ortiz L, Parra P, Ibáñez P, Matus O. Relationship between self-directed learning and value profile in Chilean medical students. Rev Med Chil. 2013;141(1):15-22. [DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872013000100003] [PMID]
9. Lu SY, Ren XP, Xu H, Han D. Improving self-directed learning ability of medical students using the blended teaching method: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):616. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04565-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Premkumar K, Vinod E, Sathishkumar S, Pulimood AB, Umaefulam V, Prasanna Samuel P, et al. Self-directed learning readiness of Indian medical students: a mixed method study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):134. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-018-1244-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Zhu M, Doo M. The relationship among motivation, self-monitoring, self-management, and learning strategies of MOOC learners. J Comput High Educ. 2021 Nov 2:1-22. [DOI:10.1007/s12528-021-09301-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Lee S, Kim DH, Chae SM. Self-directed learning and professional values of nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;42:102647. [DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102647] [PMID]
13. Nadi MA, Sajadian I. Standardization of self-directed learning readiness scale in medical students of Isfahan University. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;11(2):174-83.
14. Fisher M, King J, Tague G. Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2001;21(7):516-25. [DOI:10.1054/nedt.2001.0589] [PMID]
15. Malekian M, Ghiyasvandian S, Cheraghi MA, Hassanzadeh A. Iranian Clinical Nurses' Readiness for Self-Directed Learning. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;8(1):157-64. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v8n1p157] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Arabshahi SK, Naeimi L. Assessment of the current situation of self-directed learning skills in medical students. Razi J Med Sci. 2013;20(113):10-9.
17. Anil D, Kumar DS, Murthy MR. Self-directed learning: the impact among medical students. J Med Educ Dev. 2023;16(50):21-7. [DOI:10.32592/jmed.2023.16.50.21]
18. Murad MH, Varkey P. Self-directed learning in health professions education. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008;37(7):580-90. [DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V37N7p580] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
