Mon, Sep 7, 2026
[Archive]
| Last update: 2026/09/7 |
Peer Review Process and Editorial Policies
All submissions to the Journal of Medical Education Development go through a structured and confidential editorial process to ensure the scientific accuracy, relevance, and quality of published content. The journal follows international publishing ethics standards, including those recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
1. Initial Editorial Assessment
When submitted, each manuscript is first checked by the editorial board to see if it fits the journal's aims and scope, follows the submission and formatting guidelines, and meets the required scientific quality. Manuscripts that meet these initial criteria are given a unique tracking code. All further communication between authors and the editorial office will refer to this code.
2. Peer Review Process
After editorial approval, manuscripts are sent to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the subject. The journal uses a double-blind peer review system, where both authors and reviewers stay anonymous throughout the process. Reviewers check the manuscript for originality, methodology, clarity, ethical compliance, and scientific contribution. Authors receive feedback from reviewers and are given the chance to revise their work. The revised manuscript and responses to reviewers are then reviewed again by the editorial board.
Note: A manuscript will not be rejected unless at least two reviewers or the editorial board recommend rejection for clear and well-justified reasons.
3. Editorial Decision-Making
The final decision on acceptance, revision, or rejection is made by the Editor-in-Chief in consultation with the editorial board. Decisions are based on reviewer feedback, the quality of the revised manuscript, and its scientific value and fit with the journal's standards. The editorial team can ask for multiple rounds of revision to ensure the highest quality.
4. Editorial Integrity and Ethics
The editorial board operates in accordance with COPE's core practices and upholds the following principles:
Confidentiality: Manuscripts and reviewer identities are kept strictly confidential.
Impartiality: Editorial decisions are made fairly, based only on scientific merit.
Conflict of Interest: Editors and reviewers must declare any potential conflicts of interest and step down from handling those submissions.
Confidentiality: Manuscripts and reviewer identities are kept strictly confidential.
Impartiality: Editorial decisions are made fairly, based only on scientific merit.
Conflict of Interest: Editors and reviewers must declare any potential conflicts of interest and step down from handling those submissions.
View: 31 Time(s) |
Print: 0 Time(s) |
Email: 0 Time(s) |
0 Comment(s)
