Tue, Jun 17, 2025
[Archive]
- RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
- DUPLICATE AND REDUNDANT PUBLICATION
- CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
- CONFIDENTIALITY
- DUTIES OF AUTHORS
- DUTIES OF EDITORS
- DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
- POLICY REGARDING UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES
- ARTICLE WITHDRAWAL
- AUTHORSHIP CHANGE
- PRIVACY STATEMENT
- ETHICS IN AI UTILIZATION FOR ARTICLE WRITING
The Journal of Medical Education Development is committed to upholding ethical standards throughout the publishing process to ensure that there is no prejudice or malpractice. We follow the ethical codes set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to achieve this goal. Our publication ethics policy must be respected by all parties involved in the publication process. The following are the codes that we uphold:
1. RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
We take research misconduct very seriously and will not tolerate fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, whether intentional or not. These actions undermine the integrity of the research process and violate our ethical codes.
Fabrication
Fabrication refers to the act of making up data or results and recording or reporting them as if they are original. This can also involve the creation of fictitious research data or results that do not exist.
Falsification
Falsification refers to the act of manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Falsification can involve selectively reporting data that supports one's hypothesis and omitting data that contradicts it or altering data or results to make them more favorable or statistically significant.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution or permission and presenting them as one's own. This includes copying and pasting text from a source without citation, paraphrasing someone else's work without giving credit, and submitting someone else's work as one's own. Researchers should avoid self-plagiarism and report any suspected misconduct in good faith to the relevant institutional authority. Editors-in-chief are responsible for checking manuscripts for any signs of misconduct.
2. DUPLICATE AND REDUNDANT PUBLICATION
Duplicate and redundant publications are against our publication ethics. If a paper is already submitted and under review, it cannot be submitted elsewhere, and doing so will be considered duplication. If authors decide to submit a paper that has already been submitted, they must first cancel the initial submission before submitting elsewhere. If part of the contribution has appeared or will appear elsewhere, authors must specify the details in the cover letter accompanying the submission. While using parts of the methodology is allowed with proper citation, simultaneous submission of a translated version of a manuscript that is already submitted in another journal is allowed only if the editors-in-chief are notified.
3. CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Conflict of interests can directly undermine or be perceived to undermine the objectivity, integrity, and value of a publication through potential influence on the judgments and actions of authors regarding objective data presentation, analysis, and interpretation. Financial and non-financial interests that could create such conflicts must be declared in the text or as a footnote. No financial contract should prohibit researchers from disclosing a conflict of interest. Authors should also disclose any financial resources they have that are related to the publication.
4. CONFIDENTIALITY
Confidentiality is of utmost importance to our journal. Authors are responsible for protecting the confidentiality of research participants by removing all identifying information from manuscripts. Personal information, such as names, addresses, and other identifying details, should not be included unless it is essential for the research. Any information that could potentially lead to the identification of research participants should be removed. If the research involves vulnerable populations, such as children or individuals with mental health issues, extra care should be taken to ensure confidentiality. Authors should also obtain informed consent from participants and explain how their personal information will be used. Reviewers and editors are required to maintain the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and not disclose any information to third parties. Any breach of confidentiality will be taken seriously and may result in disciplinary action.
5. DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Authors are expected to adhere to high ethical standards in all aspects of their research and writing. This includes reporting their findings accurately and objectively, acknowledging the contributions of others, and disclosing any potential conflicts of interest. Authors should also ensure that their research is conducted ethically and responsibly, and that they have obtained informed consent from research participants when necessary. They should also comply with relevant laws and regulations, including those related to the protection of human subjects and the use of animals in research. Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original and has not been previously published or submitted elsewhere. If authors wish to use material that has been previously published, they must obtain permission from the copyright holder and clearly indicate the source of the material. Authors should also be willing to participate in the peer review process and respond to reviewers' comments in a timely and constructive manner. Finally, authors must ensure that their work is free from plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct.
6. DUTIES OF EDITORS
Editors play a critical role in ensuring the quality and integrity of the research published in our journal. They are responsible for making decisions about which articles to publish based on their originality, importance, and relevance to the field. Editors must also ensure that all submissions are subjected to a rigorous and fair peer review process that is conducted in a timely and confidential manner. They should select peer reviewers who have the appropriate expertise and qualifications to evaluate the submitted work and ensure that they are free from conflicts of interest. Editors should also provide clear and constructive feedback to authors and make decisions about revisions or rejections based on the quality and validity of the research. They should also ensure that all published articles comply with ethical standards, including those related to the protection of human subjects and the use of animals in research. Editors must maintain the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and not disclose any information to third parties. Finally, editors should promote transparency and openness in the publication process by providing clear guidelines for authors, reviewers, and readers and by making the journal's policies and procedures readily available.
7. DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
Reviewers play an essential role in ensuring the quality and validity of the research published in our journal. They are responsible for providing constructive feedback to authors, evaluating the originality and significance of the research, and assessing whether the manuscript meets the standards of the journal. Reviewers should also ensure that all research involving human subjects or animals is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner, and that the authors have obtained informed consent when necessary. Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and not disclose any information about the manuscript to third parties. If a reviewer feels they cannot provide an objective assessment of the manuscript due to a conflict of interest, they should decline to review it. Reviewers should also disclose any potential conflicts of interest to the editor. They should provide their feedback in a timely and constructive manner and explain their reasoning clearly. Finally, reviewers should be willing to participate in the revision process and respond to authors' comments and concerns.
8. POLICY REGARDING UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES
The publisher and editors are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical publishing. In the event of allegations or evidence of scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication, or plagiarism, appropriate action will be taken. This may involve issuing an erratum, providing clarifications, or retracting the affected work.
The publisher and editors hold the responsibility to prevent the publication of papers that involve research misconduct, and they are dedicated to ensuring that such misconduct does not occur under their oversight.
9. ARTICLE WITHDRAWAL
Authors can withdraw their article before the final decision is made by emailing the editorial board and explaining the reason for withdrawal. The editor-in-chief can decide whether to return the manuscript or not. If there are flaws in ethical codes, data, methodology, or conclusion, the article can be withdrawn by the editor's decision. If the article is ready to publish and the author withdraws it, only the title will be published online with a note explaining why the article was withdrawn. If there is a court sentence or a risk of publishing confidential or risky information, the editor-in-chief may decide to omit the article entirely, leaving only the title and author's name.
10. AUTHORSHIP CHANG
At the Journal of Medical Education Development, we recognize the importance of authorship in scientific publication and understand that changes in authorship may occur for various reasons. We strive to maintain the integrity of the publication process and ensure that authorship accurately reflects the contributions of all individuals involved in the research.
In the event of a change in authorship, we request that all authors involved in the research work collaboratively to complete agreement form for change and submit a copy to the journal’s email address (edujournal
zums.ac.ir). This process ensures that everyone is aware of and has the opportunity to provide input on the change. We also require a detailed explanation for the author change, including the reason for the change and a description of each author's contributions.
If a change in authorship is requested after the article has been published, we will evaluate the request on a case-by-case basis. We require a written explanation from the corresponding author and the consent of all authors involved in the research, including any added or removed authors. We will also consider any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from changing authors.
At the Journal of Medical Education Development, we take authorship seriously and are committed to ensuring that everyone involved in the research receives proper credit for their contributions. We understand that changing authorship can be a sensitive issue and handle all requests with the utmost care and caution.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding authorship changes, please contact the editorial office. We are committed to supporting our authors throughout the publication process and maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing.
11. PRIVACY STATEMENT
The Journal of Medical Education Development is committed to protecting the privacy of our authors, reviewers, and readers. This privacy statement outlines how we collect, use, and protect personal information.
Collection of Personal Information
We may collect personal information, such as name, email address, and institutional affiliation, in the course of conducting our editorial and publishing activities. This information is collected only with the consent of the individual and is necessary for the administration of the journal.
Use of Personal Information
Personal information is used solely for the purpose of editorial and publishing activities, including peer review, editorial correspondence, and publication. We do not share personal information with third parties, except as required by law or with the consent of the individual.
Protection of Personal Information
We take reasonable measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration. We use industry-standard security measures, such as firewalls and encryption, to protect personal information. However, no system can guarantee 100% security, and we cannot guarantee the security of personal information transmitted over the internet.
Access to Personal Information
Individuals have the right to access, correct, or delete their personal information in our records. To request access, correction, or deletion of personal information, please contact the journal's editorial office.
Changes to this Privacy Statement
We may update this privacy statement from time to time to reflect changes in our editorial and publishing activities. We will notify individuals of any significant changes to this privacy statement.
12. ETHICS IN AI UTILIZATION FOR ARTICLE WRITING
1. RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
We take research misconduct very seriously and will not tolerate fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, whether intentional or not. These actions undermine the integrity of the research process and violate our ethical codes.
Fabrication
Fabrication refers to the act of making up data or results and recording or reporting them as if they are original. This can also involve the creation of fictitious research data or results that do not exist.
Falsification
Falsification refers to the act of manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Falsification can involve selectively reporting data that supports one's hypothesis and omitting data that contradicts it or altering data or results to make them more favorable or statistically significant.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution or permission and presenting them as one's own. This includes copying and pasting text from a source without citation, paraphrasing someone else's work without giving credit, and submitting someone else's work as one's own. Researchers should avoid self-plagiarism and report any suspected misconduct in good faith to the relevant institutional authority. Editors-in-chief are responsible for checking manuscripts for any signs of misconduct.
2. DUPLICATE AND REDUNDANT PUBLICATION
Duplicate and redundant publications are against our publication ethics. If a paper is already submitted and under review, it cannot be submitted elsewhere, and doing so will be considered duplication. If authors decide to submit a paper that has already been submitted, they must first cancel the initial submission before submitting elsewhere. If part of the contribution has appeared or will appear elsewhere, authors must specify the details in the cover letter accompanying the submission. While using parts of the methodology is allowed with proper citation, simultaneous submission of a translated version of a manuscript that is already submitted in another journal is allowed only if the editors-in-chief are notified.
3. CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Conflict of interests can directly undermine or be perceived to undermine the objectivity, integrity, and value of a publication through potential influence on the judgments and actions of authors regarding objective data presentation, analysis, and interpretation. Financial and non-financial interests that could create such conflicts must be declared in the text or as a footnote. No financial contract should prohibit researchers from disclosing a conflict of interest. Authors should also disclose any financial resources they have that are related to the publication.
4. CONFIDENTIALITY
Confidentiality is of utmost importance to our journal. Authors are responsible for protecting the confidentiality of research participants by removing all identifying information from manuscripts. Personal information, such as names, addresses, and other identifying details, should not be included unless it is essential for the research. Any information that could potentially lead to the identification of research participants should be removed. If the research involves vulnerable populations, such as children or individuals with mental health issues, extra care should be taken to ensure confidentiality. Authors should also obtain informed consent from participants and explain how their personal information will be used. Reviewers and editors are required to maintain the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and not disclose any information to third parties. Any breach of confidentiality will be taken seriously and may result in disciplinary action.
5. DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Authors are expected to adhere to high ethical standards in all aspects of their research and writing. This includes reporting their findings accurately and objectively, acknowledging the contributions of others, and disclosing any potential conflicts of interest. Authors should also ensure that their research is conducted ethically and responsibly, and that they have obtained informed consent from research participants when necessary. They should also comply with relevant laws and regulations, including those related to the protection of human subjects and the use of animals in research. Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original and has not been previously published or submitted elsewhere. If authors wish to use material that has been previously published, they must obtain permission from the copyright holder and clearly indicate the source of the material. Authors should also be willing to participate in the peer review process and respond to reviewers' comments in a timely and constructive manner. Finally, authors must ensure that their work is free from plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct.
6. DUTIES OF EDITORS
Editors play a critical role in ensuring the quality and integrity of the research published in our journal. They are responsible for making decisions about which articles to publish based on their originality, importance, and relevance to the field. Editors must also ensure that all submissions are subjected to a rigorous and fair peer review process that is conducted in a timely and confidential manner. They should select peer reviewers who have the appropriate expertise and qualifications to evaluate the submitted work and ensure that they are free from conflicts of interest. Editors should also provide clear and constructive feedback to authors and make decisions about revisions or rejections based on the quality and validity of the research. They should also ensure that all published articles comply with ethical standards, including those related to the protection of human subjects and the use of animals in research. Editors must maintain the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and not disclose any information to third parties. Finally, editors should promote transparency and openness in the publication process by providing clear guidelines for authors, reviewers, and readers and by making the journal's policies and procedures readily available.
7. DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
Reviewers play an essential role in ensuring the quality and validity of the research published in our journal. They are responsible for providing constructive feedback to authors, evaluating the originality and significance of the research, and assessing whether the manuscript meets the standards of the journal. Reviewers should also ensure that all research involving human subjects or animals is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner, and that the authors have obtained informed consent when necessary. Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and not disclose any information about the manuscript to third parties. If a reviewer feels they cannot provide an objective assessment of the manuscript due to a conflict of interest, they should decline to review it. Reviewers should also disclose any potential conflicts of interest to the editor. They should provide their feedback in a timely and constructive manner and explain their reasoning clearly. Finally, reviewers should be willing to participate in the revision process and respond to authors' comments and concerns.
8. POLICY REGARDING UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES
The publisher and editors are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical publishing. In the event of allegations or evidence of scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication, or plagiarism, appropriate action will be taken. This may involve issuing an erratum, providing clarifications, or retracting the affected work.
The publisher and editors hold the responsibility to prevent the publication of papers that involve research misconduct, and they are dedicated to ensuring that such misconduct does not occur under their oversight.
9. ARTICLE WITHDRAWAL
Authors can withdraw their article before the final decision is made by emailing the editorial board and explaining the reason for withdrawal. The editor-in-chief can decide whether to return the manuscript or not. If there are flaws in ethical codes, data, methodology, or conclusion, the article can be withdrawn by the editor's decision. If the article is ready to publish and the author withdraws it, only the title will be published online with a note explaining why the article was withdrawn. If there is a court sentence or a risk of publishing confidential or risky information, the editor-in-chief may decide to omit the article entirely, leaving only the title and author's name.
10. AUTHORSHIP CHANG
At the Journal of Medical Education Development, we recognize the importance of authorship in scientific publication and understand that changes in authorship may occur for various reasons. We strive to maintain the integrity of the publication process and ensure that authorship accurately reflects the contributions of all individuals involved in the research.
In the event of a change in authorship, we request that all authors involved in the research work collaboratively to complete agreement form for change and submit a copy to the journal’s email address (edujournal
zums.ac.ir). This process ensures that everyone is aware of and has the opportunity to provide input on the change. We also require a detailed explanation for the author change, including the reason for the change and a description of each author's contributions.If a change in authorship is requested after the article has been published, we will evaluate the request on a case-by-case basis. We require a written explanation from the corresponding author and the consent of all authors involved in the research, including any added or removed authors. We will also consider any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from changing authors.
At the Journal of Medical Education Development, we take authorship seriously and are committed to ensuring that everyone involved in the research receives proper credit for their contributions. We understand that changing authorship can be a sensitive issue and handle all requests with the utmost care and caution.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding authorship changes, please contact the editorial office. We are committed to supporting our authors throughout the publication process and maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing.
11. PRIVACY STATEMENT
The Journal of Medical Education Development is committed to protecting the privacy of our authors, reviewers, and readers. This privacy statement outlines how we collect, use, and protect personal information.
Collection of Personal Information
We may collect personal information, such as name, email address, and institutional affiliation, in the course of conducting our editorial and publishing activities. This information is collected only with the consent of the individual and is necessary for the administration of the journal.
Use of Personal Information
Personal information is used solely for the purpose of editorial and publishing activities, including peer review, editorial correspondence, and publication. We do not share personal information with third parties, except as required by law or with the consent of the individual.
Protection of Personal Information
We take reasonable measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration. We use industry-standard security measures, such as firewalls and encryption, to protect personal information. However, no system can guarantee 100% security, and we cannot guarantee the security of personal information transmitted over the internet.
Access to Personal Information
Individuals have the right to access, correct, or delete their personal information in our records. To request access, correction, or deletion of personal information, please contact the journal's editorial office.
Changes to this Privacy Statement
We may update this privacy statement from time to time to reflect changes in our editorial and publishing activities. We will notify individuals of any significant changes to this privacy statement.
12. ETHICS IN AI UTILIZATION FOR ARTICLE WRITING
The criteria for authorship stipulate that authorship should be reserved for individuals who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. Co-authorship is appropriate for those who have provided substantial contributions. Individuals who have played a role in writing the article but do not meet the writing criteria should be acknowledged. In line with these principles, the Journal of Medical Education Development staunchly disapproves of articles where artificial intelligence is utilized to generate content. In the event that this is discovered post-printing, the published article will be retracted. Additionally, the journal rejects articles featuring figures or tables created or altered by artificial intelligence. These guidelines uphold the importance of genuine human contributions in scholarly work and ensure the integrity of the published content.
Contact Information
If you have any questions or concerns about this privacy statement or our practices regarding personal information, please contact the journal's editorial office at edujournal
zums.ac.ir.
View: 16640 Time(s) |
Print: 1488 Time(s) |
Email: 35 Time(s) |
0 Comment(s)
